Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34398311›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of biometeorology2021

Peloidotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot randomized clinical trial.

Fulya Demircioğlu Güneri, Fatma Begüm Erol Forestier, Romain J Forestier, Serap Seringeç Karabulut, Fatih Karaarslan, Müfit Zeki Karagülle, Mine Karagülle

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of biometeorology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Fulya Demircioğlu GüneriDepartment of Medical Ecology and Hydroclimatology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey. fuliad@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2469-0774
Fatma Begüm Erol ForestierCentre de Recherce Rhumatologique Et Termal, Aix Les Bains, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1569-2260
Romain J ForestierCentre de Recherce Rhumatologique Et Termal, Aix Les Bains, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3093-0415
Serap Seringeç KarabulutDepartment of Medical Ecology and Hydroclimatology, Gazi Osmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5088-0737
Fatih KaraarslanDepartment of Medical Ecology and Hydroclimatology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1107-5887
Müfit Zeki KaragülleDepartment of Medical Ecology and Hydroclimatology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3288-5037
Mine KaragülleDepartment of Medical Ecology and Hydroclimatology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8060-970X
Brides-les-Bains · FRIstanbul University · TRGülhane Askerî Tıp Akademisi · TRSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the additional effect and safety of peloidotherapy to usual care at short- and middle-term in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RA patients were recruited in the medical ecology and hydroclimatology department of Istanbul Medical Faculty and were randomized into two parallel groups. Peloidotherapy group was treated with heated mudpack (41-42 °C) on painful and active joints (5 days/week, during 2 weeks) + usual care. Control group received usual care alone. Randomization was performed by using a computer-generated table of random numbers and was blinded. The sequence was concealed until interventions were assigned. The investigator was blinded. The assessments were done before and after the intervention, 1 month and 3 months after the completion of treatment. The main criterion was the number of patients with low disease activity (DAS 28 ≤ 3.2) at the end of follow-up. Other judgment criteria were pain (VAS), patient's global assessment (VAS), physician's global assessment (VAS), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Disease Activity Score (DAS 28), CRP, and ESR. Fifty-six patients were recruited and analyzed: 29 in peloidotherapy group and 27 in the control group between 11/2011 and 02/2012. At the third month, 9/29 patients were with low disease activity in peloidotherapy group and 4/27 in the control group (p = 0.15). There was a statistically significant improvement in favor of peloidotherapy group for HAQ during all follow-up period (0.25 vs 0.63, p = 0.007 at the end of the treatment, 0.29 vs 0.68 p = 0.007 at the 1st month and 0.30 vs 0.59, p = 0.040 at the 3

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidQuality of LifeHumansPilot ProjectsTreatment OutcomeBalneotherapyDisease activityPainPeloidotherapyRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID34398311
OpenAlexW3196078341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.