Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34398260›Full record

Observational studyRheumatology international2021

Are patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome or hypermobility spectrum disorder so different?

Bérengère Aubry-Rozier, Adrien Schwitzguebel, Flore Valerio, Joelle Tanniger, Célia Paquier, Chantal Berna, Thomas Hügle, Charles Benaim

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Rheumatology international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Financial Impact of Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes on Patients in the United States in 2022.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bérengère Aubry-RozierRheumatology, Clinique Bois-Cerf, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Adrien SchwitzguebelRehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Providence Hospital, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8212-1812
Flore ValerioRheumatology, HFR Fribourg, Villars-sur-Glâne, Switzerland.
Joelle TannigerPhysiotherapy, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Célia PaquierPhysiotherapy, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Chantal BernaCenter for Integrative and Complementary Medicine & Pain Center, Division of Anesthesiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8258-7412
Thomas HügleRheumatology and Rehabilitation, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3276-9581
Charles BenaimRheumatology and Rehabilitation, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. Charles.Benaim@chuv.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8999-0674

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosing hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) remains challenging, despite new 2017 criteria. Patients not fulfilling these criteria are considered to have hypermobile spectrum disorder (HSD). Our first aim was to evaluate whether patients hEDS were more severely affected and had higher prevalence of extra-articular manifestations than HSD. Second aim was to compare their outcome after coordinated physical therapy. Patients fulfilling hEDS/HSD criteria were included in this real-life prospective cohort (November 2017/April 2019). They completed a 16-item Clinical Severity Score (CSS-16). We recorded bone involvement, neuropathic pain (DN4) and symptoms of mast cell disorders (MCAS) as extra-articular manifestations. After a standardized initial evaluation (T0), all patients were offered the same coordinated physical therapy, were followed-up at 6 months (T1) and at least 1 year later (T2), and were asked whether or not their condition had subjectively improved at T2. We included 97 patients (61 hEDS, 36 HSD). Median age was 40 (range 18-73); 92.7% were females. Three items from CSS-16 (pain, motricity problems, and bleeding) were significantly more severe with hEDS than HSD. Bone fragility, neuropathic pain and MCAS were equally prevalent. At T2 (20 months [range 18-26]) 54% of patients reported improvement (no difference between groups). On multivariable analysis, only family history of hypermobility predicted (favorable) outcome (p = 0.01). hEDS and HDS patients showed similar disease severity score except for pain, motricity problems and bleeding, and similar spectrum of extra-articular manifestations. Long-term improvement was observed in > 50% of patients in both groups. These results add weight to a clinical pragmatic proposition to consider hEDS/HSD as a single entity that requires the same treatments.

Indexed as

AdultAgedEhlers-Danlos SyndromeFemaleHumansJoint InstabilityMaleMiddle AgedPatient AcuityPhysical Therapy ModalitiesProspective StudiesDiagnosis-related groupsEhlers–Danlos syndromeHealth careOutcome assessmentSymptom assessment

Identifiers

PMID34398260
PMCPMC8390400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.