Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34398248›Full record

ReviewHerz2021

Current devices and interventions in mitral regurgitation.

Benedikt Koell, Daniel Kalbacher, Edith Lubos

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herz, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Clinical Impact of Computational Heart Valve Models.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benedikt KoellDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Daniel KalbacherDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Edith LubosDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany. e.lubos@uke.de.
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most common valvular disease. With a rising incidence in older age, the prevalence of relevant comorbidities inevitably increases. Considering the constantly aging population with high surgical risk, transcatheter therapy of MR is gaining increasing importance. Interventional therapy of either primary or secondary MR represents an alternative to pure drug or surgical therapy. With mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, a well-established treatment has evolved in the past two decades. In addition, direct or indirect annuloplasty and ultimately transcatheter mitral valve implantation further expand the armamentarium. The current broad spectrum of interventional therapy options allows for patient-oriented therapy individually targeting different MR pathologies. This review discusses the current landscape of transcatheter therapies for relevant MR.

Indexed as

Heart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationMitral Valve AnnuloplastyMitral Valve InsufficiencyAgedAortic ValveCardiac CatheterizationHumansMitral ValveTreatment OutcomeMitral valve insufficiencyStructural heart diseaseTranscatheter mitral valve implantationTranscatheter mitral valve repairTranscatheter therapy

Identifiers

PMID34398248
OpenAlexW3195497182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.