Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34398008›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2021

Early use of tocilizumab in patients with severe pneumonia secondary to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection and poor prognostic criteria: Impact on mortality rate and intensive care unit admission.

Pedro Sánchez-Rovira, Gerardo Pérez-Chica, Ana Laura Ortega-Granados, Josefa Aguilar-García, Leticia Díaz-Beltrán, Fernando Gálvez-Montosa, Francisco García-Verdejo, Natalia Luque-Caro, Cristina Quero-Blanco, Mónica Fernández-Navarro and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pedro Sánchez-RoviraMedical Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Jaen, Jaen, Spain.
Gerardo Pérez-Chica
Ana Laura Ortega-Granados
Josefa Aguilar-García
Leticia Díaz-Beltrán
Fernando Gálvez-Montosa
Francisco García-Verdejo
Natalia Luque-Caro
Cristina Quero-Blanco
Mónica Fernández-Navarro
Agustín Rodríguez-Sánchez
Manuel Ruiz-Bailén
Luis Yaguez-Mateos
Juan Francisco Marín-Pozo
María Isabel Sierra-Torres
Celia Lacárcel-Bautista
Gaspar Jesús Duro-Ruiz
María Ángeles Duro-Fernández
Javier García-Alegría
Carmen Herrero-Rodríguez
Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, keeps spreading globally. Evidence suggests that a subgroup of patients with severe symptomatology might have cytokine storms, which increases mortality. The use of interleukin-6 (IL-6) inhibitors may help in controlling the pathological immune response to the virus. Tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody against IL-6, stands as an optional treatment for COVID-19 patients presenting this inflammatory hyper-response.We conducted a retrospective, observational, cohort study including 50 patients affected by COVID-19 with severe pneumonia and poor prognosis criteria, who have also undergone standard treatment; 36 of these patients additionally received tocilizumab in an early stage. The need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mortality, recovery of respiratory function, and improvement of biochemical and hematological parameters were compared between cohorts.Most patients were men, non-smokers and the most frequently reported comorbidities were hypertension and diabetes. Recurrent symptoms were fever, cough, and dyspnoea. 54.8% of patients from the tocilizumab group needed intubation, while in the control group 85.7% needed it. Treatment with tocilizumab significatively increased IL-6 levels, (554.45; CI 95% 186.69, 1032.93; P < .05) while C-reactive protein mean levels were reduced (-108.19; CI 95% -140.15, -75.33; P < .05), but no significant difference was found between cohorts. In comparison with the controls, tocilizumab reduced mortality (25.0% vs 42.9%, P = .021) and the number of ICU admissions (63.9% vs 100.0%, P = .021). 44.1% of patients treated with tocilizumab showed favorable radiological evolution, when compared with 15.4% of patients from the control group.Tocilizumab may improve clinical symptoms and mitigate deterioration observed in severe COVID-19 patients, and could be considered as an effective therapeutic option in subjects experiencing a significant inflammatory response to the disease.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentInterleukin-6 InhibitorsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCOVID-19FemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsInterleukin-6MaleMiddle AgedPneumonia, ViralPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedIL6 protein, humanInterleukin-6Interleukin-6 Inhibitorstocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID34398008
PMCPMC8294903
OpenAlexW3189417035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.