ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2021
BiasNet: A Model to Predict Ligand Bias Toward GPCR Signaling.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elucidating the Structure and Activation Mechanisms of GPCRs Using Modern Computational and AI Tools.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Review
- Ligand-Induced Biased Activation of GPCRs: Recent Advances and New Directions from In Silico Approaches.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- GPCR-IPL score: multilevel featurization of GPCR-ligand interaction patterns and prediction of ligand functions from selectivity to biased activation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Orphan G protein-coupled receptors: the ongoing search for a home.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Can machine learning 'transform' peptides/peptidomimetics into small molecules? A case study with ghrelin receptor ligands.Molecular diversity · 2023Article
- Functional selectivity of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases regulates distinct cellular outputs.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
- New characterization of dihydroergotamine receptor pharmacology in the context of migraine: utilization of a β-arrestin recruitment assay.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Epidermal growth factor receptor cascade prioritizes the maximization of signal transduction.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Signaling bias is a feature of many G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) targeting drugs with potential clinical implications. Whether it is therapeutically advantageous for a drug to be G protein biased or β-arrestin biased depends on the context of the signaling pathway. Here, we explored GPCR ligands that exhibit biased signaling to gain insights into scaffolds and pharmacophores that lead to bias. More specifically, we considered BiasDB, a database containing information about GPCR biased ligands, and focused our analysis on ligands which show either a G protein or β-arrestin bias. Five different machine learning models were trained on these ligands using 15 different sets of features. Molecular fragments which were important for training the models were analyzed. Two of these fragments (number of secondary amines and number of aromatic amines) were more prevalent in β-arrestin biased ligands. After training a random forest model on HierS scaffolds, we found five scaffolds, which demonstrated G protein or β-arrestin bias. We also conducted t-SNE clustering, observing correspondence between unsupervised and supervised machine learning methods. To increase the applicability of our work, we developed a web implementation of our models, which can predict bias based on user-provided SMILES, drug names, or PubChem CID. Our web implementation is available at: drugdiscovery.utep.edu/biasnet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.