Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34397210›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2021

BiasNet: A Model to Predict Ligand Bias Toward GPCR Signaling.

Jason E Sanchez, Govinda B Kc, Julian Franco, William J Allen, Jesus David Garcia, Suman Sirimulla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jason E SanchezComputational Science Program, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79968, United States.
Govinda B KcComputational Science Program, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79968, United States.
Julian FrancoMechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79968, United States.
William J AllenTexas Advanced Computing Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78758, United States.
Jesus David GarciaComputer Science, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79968, United States.
Suman SirimullaComputational Science Program, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79968, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4665-6665

Funding

Phase II of BUILDing SCHOLARSUL1GM118970 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS EL PASO · PI ALEY, STEPHEN B, BOLAND, THOMAS · 2015 to 2023
$17.9M
Phase II of BUILDing SCHOLARS - Student Training CoreTL4GM118971 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS EL PASO · PI ALEY, STEPHEN B, BOLAND, THOMAS · 2015 to 2023
$9.9M
Phase II of BUILDing SCHOLARS - Research Enrichment CoreRL5GM118969 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS EL PASO · PI ALEY, STEPHEN B, BOLAND, THOMAS · 2015 to 2023
$7.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS RL5 GM118969NIGMS NIH HHS TL4 GM118971NIGMS NIH HHS UL1 GM118970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Signaling bias is a feature of many G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) targeting drugs with potential clinical implications. Whether it is therapeutically advantageous for a drug to be G protein biased or β-arrestin biased depends on the context of the signaling pathway. Here, we explored GPCR ligands that exhibit biased signaling to gain insights into scaffolds and pharmacophores that lead to bias. More specifically, we considered BiasDB, a database containing information about GPCR biased ligands, and focused our analysis on ligands which show either a G protein or β-arrestin bias. Five different machine learning models were trained on these ligands using 15 different sets of features. Molecular fragments which were important for training the models were analyzed. Two of these fragments (number of secondary amines and number of aromatic amines) were more prevalent in β-arrestin biased ligands. After training a random forest model on HierS scaffolds, we found five scaffolds, which demonstrated G protein or β-arrestin bias. We also conducted t-SNE clustering, observing correspondence between unsupervised and supervised machine learning methods. To increase the applicability of our work, we developed a web implementation of our models, which can predict bias based on user-provided SMILES, drug names, or PubChem CID. Our web implementation is available at: drugdiscovery.utep.edu/biasnet.

Indexed as

Receptors, G-Protein-CoupledSignal Transductionbeta-ArrestinsLigandsProtein Bindingbeta-ArrestinsLigandsReceptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID34397210
PMCPMC8482801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.