ArticleThe plant genome2021
Environment characterization and genomic prediction for end-use quality traits in soft white winter wheat.
Article in The plant genome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating reaction norm and fixed effect models for genomic selection of end-use quality in wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Optimizing resource allocation inFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Genetic architecture of end-use quality traits in soft white winter wheat.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Developing core marker sets for effective genomic-assisted selection in wheat and barley breeding programs.Breeding science · 2022Article
- Multi-Trait Multi-Environment Genomic Prediction for End-Use Quality Traits in Winter Wheat.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Environment characterization and genomic prediction for end-use quality traits in soft white winter wheat.The plant genome · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
End-use quality phenotyping is laborious and expensive, thus, testing may not occur until later generations in wheat breeding programs. We investigated the pattern of genotype × environment (G × E) interaction for end-use quality traits in soft white wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and tested the effectiveness of implementing genomic selection to optimize breeding for these traits. We used a multi-environment unbalanced dataset comprised of 672 breeding lines and cultivars adapted to the Pacific Northwest region of the United States, which were evaluated for 14 end-use quality traits. Genetic correlations between environments based on factor analytic models showed low-to-moderate G × E interaction for most traits but high G × E interaction for grain and flour protein. A total of 40,518 single-nucleotide polymorphism markers were used for genomic prediction. Genomic prediction accuracies were high for most traits thereby justifying the use of genomic selection to assist breeding for superior end-use quality in soft white wheat. Excluding outlier environments based on genetic correlations between environments was more effective in increasing genomic prediction accuracies compared with that based on environment clustering analysis. For kernel size, kernel weight, milling score, ash, and flour swelling volume, excluding outlier environments increased prediction accuracies by 1-11%. However, for grain and flour protein, flour yield, and cookie diameter, excluding outlier environments did not improve genomic prediction performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.