Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34396487›Full record

Observational studyActa neurologica Belgica2022

Impact of recurrence pattern in patients undergoing a second surgery for recurrent glioblastoma.

Francesco Pasqualetti, Nicola Montemurro, Isacco Desideri, Mauro Loi, Noemi Giannini, Giovanni Gadducci, Giulia Malfatti, Martina Cantarella, Alessandra Gonnelli, Sabrina Montrone and 8 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Cell-Free miRNAs as Non-Invasive Biomarkers in Brain Tumors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Brain Tumor and Augmented Reality: New Technologies for the Future.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Francesco PasqualettiRadiation Oncology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy. f.pasqualetti@ao-pisa.toscana.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0788-1205
Nicola MontemurroNeurosurgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Isacco DesideriRadiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy.
Mauro LoiRadiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy.
Noemi GianniniRadiation Oncology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy.
Giovanni GadducciRadiation Oncology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy.
Giulia MalfattiRadiation Oncology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy.
Martina CantarellaRadiation Oncology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy.
Alessandra GonnelliRadiation Oncology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy.
Sabrina MontroneRadiation Oncology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy.
Luca VisaniRadiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy.
Cristian ScatenaDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Antonio Giuseppe NaccaratoDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Paolo PerriniRadiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy.
Carlo GambaccianiNurosurgery Unit, Area Vasta-NordOvest, Livorno General Hospital, Livorno, Italy.
Orazio SantonocitoNurosurgery Unit, Area Vasta-NordOvest, Livorno General Hospital, Livorno, Italy.
Riccardo MorgantiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Fabiola PaiarRadiation Oncology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of different patterns of glioblastoma (GBM) recurrence has not yet been fully established in patients suitable for a second surgery. Through the present observational study carried out at Pisa University Hospital, we aimed to investigate how different patterns of GBM failure influence second surgery outcomes. Overall survival (OS) and post-recurrence survival (PRS) were assessed according to clinical characteristics, including pattern of recurrence, in a prospective cohort of recurrent GBM patients. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was applied to evaluate the differences between curves. Patients with local recurrence had better OS than patients with non-local one, 24.1 versus 18.2 months, respectively [P = 0.015, HR = 1.856 (1.130-3.050)]. The second surgery conferred an advantage in OS respect to non-operated patients, however, this advantage was more evident in patients with local recurrence [P = 0.002 with HR 0.212 (95% CI 0.081-0.552) and P = 0.029 with HR = 0.522 (95% CI 0.291-0.936), respectively]. The recurrence pattern can influence the outcome of patients with recurrent GBM suitable for a second surgery.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaCohort StudiesHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesGlioblastomaPattern of failureRecurrent glioblastomaSecond surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.