ArticleJACC. CardioOncology2021
Left Ventricular Assist Devices in Patients With Active Malignancies.
Article in JACC. CardioOncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heart transplantation in pediatric oncology patients.JHLT open · 2026Article
- Mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to cancer therapy in patients with end stage heart failure: a single center experience.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2026Article
- Review
- Treating Concomitant Advanced Heart Failure and Advanced Cancer With Left Ventricular Assist Device, Surgery, and Biologics.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular Toxicity in Patients Treated for Childhood Cancer: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2025Review
- Cardio-Oncology and Heart Failure: a Scientific Statement From the Heart Failure Society of America.Journal of cardiac failure · 2025Review
- Case study with dosimetric analysis: Total body irradiation to a patient with a left ventricular assist device.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
- Left Ventricular Assist Device as a Destination Therapy: Current Situation and the Importance of Patient Selection.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Diagnosis and Management of Cancer Treatment-Related Cardiac Dysfunction and Heart Failure in Children.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Novel Therapeutics for Anthracycline Induced Cardiotoxicity.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Adding a Rock to a Hard Place: Mechanical Circulatory Support, Active Cancer, Proceed With Caution.JACC. CardioOncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are limited data to guide oncology and cardiology decision-making in patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and concurrent active malignancy.
objectivesThe goal of this study was to describe cancer treatment approaches, complications, and survival among patients with active cancer on LVAD support in 2 tertiary heart failure and oncology programs.
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, LVAD databases were reviewed to identify patients with a cancer diagnosis at the time of or after LVAD implantation. We created a 3:1 matched cohort based on age, sex, etiology of cardiomyopathy, LVAD implant strategy, and INTERMACS profile stratified by site. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare survival between patients with cancer and non-cancer comparators.
resultsAmong 1,123 patients who underwent LVAD implantation between 2005 and 2019, 22 patients with LVADs with active cancer and 66 matched non-cancer comparators were identified. Median age was 62 years (range 41 to 73 years); 50% of patients with cancer were African-American, and 27% were women. Prostate cancer, followed by renal cell cancer and hematologic malignancies were the most common diagnoses. There was no significant difference in unadjusted Kaplan-Meier median survival estimates from the time of LVAD placement between patients with cancer (3.53 years; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41 to 5.33) and non-cancer comparators (3.03 years; 95% CI: 1.83 to 5.26; log-rank
conclusionsOur study provides initial feasibility and safety data and set a framework for multidisciplinary team management of patients with cancer and LVADs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.