Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34396324›Full record

ReviewJACC. CardioOncology2021

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Cardio-Oncology: Advantages, Importance of Expediency, and Considerations to Navigate Pre-Authorization.

Rupal O'Quinn, Victor A Ferrari, Ryan Daly, Greg Hundley, Lauren A Baldassarre, Yuchi Han, Ana Barac, Anita Arnold

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JACC. CardioOncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. An innovative hybrid imaging protocol for whole-bodyCardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Imaging of heart disease in women: review and case presentation.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Review
  17. Cardio-Oncology Care Delivered in the Non-academic Environment.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rupal O'QuinnDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Victor A FerrariDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ryan DalyFranciscan Health Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Greg HundleyVirginia Commonwealth University Pauley Heart Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Lauren A BaldassarreSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Yuchi HanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ana BaracMedstar Heart and Vascular Institute, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Anita ArnoldLee Health, Division of Cardio-Oncology, Fort Myers, Florida, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosis of acute and late cardiotoxicity from cancer therapeutics has become increasingly important as the scope of cardio-oncology increases exponentially, both in terms of the number of people affected and the types of therapies it encompasses. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is a tool that can offer unparalleled diagnostic information compared with other imaging modalities, but its utilization is often delayed, at the expense of patient care, due to the need for insurance pre-authorization. This paper highlights situations in which CMR is preferred as the diagnostic modality and provides examples of diagnoses more likely to be approved by insurance companies. It also provides specific cardio-oncology diagnoses or questions to help the clinical cardio-oncologist navigate the pre-authorization process.

Indexed as

2D, 2-dimensionalACC, American College of CardiologyCAD, coronary artery diseasecardiac magnetic resonancecardio-oncologycardiotoxicitychemotherapyCMR, cardiac magnetic resonanceCTRCD, cancer treatment–related cardiac dysfunctionECV, extracellular volumeGLS, global longitudinal strainICI, immune checkpoint inhibitorsleft ventricular dysfunctionLGE, late gadolinium enhancementLVEF, left ventricular ejection fractionLV, left ventricularMACE, major adverse cardiovascular eventpre-authorizationRV, right ventricular

Identifiers

PMID34396324
PMCPMC8352183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.