Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34396314›Full record

ReviewJACC. CardioOncology2021

How to Manage Atrial Fibrillation Secondary to Ibrutinib.

Hani Essa, Taha Lodhi, Rebecca Dobson, David Wright, Gregory Y H Lip

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JACC. CardioOncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Anticoagulants in hematologic malignancies: what is the data?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Review
  5. Developing a simple clinical risk score for ibrutinib-associated atrial fibrillation.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Comparative arrhythmia patterns among patients on tyrosine kinase inhibitors.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024
    Article
  10. Cardiology and oncology: a meeting of giants.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Palpitations in the Cancer Patient.European cardiology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hani EssaLiverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Taha LodhiClinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Rebecca DobsonLiverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
David WrightLiverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Gregory Y H LipLiverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital · GBThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AF, atrial fibrillationarrhythmiaBTK, Bruton’s tyrosine kinaseDOAC, direct oral anticoagulantECG, electrocardiogramechocardiographyLMWH, low molecular weight heparinOR, odds ratiotreatment

Identifiers

PMID34396314
PMCPMC8352308
OpenAlexW3137277615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.