Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34396100›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2021

Prediction of response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in phantom sounds based on individual brain anatomy.

Timm B Poeppl, Martin Schecklmann, Katrin Sakreida, Michael Landgrebe, Berthold Langguth, Simon B Eickhoff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Timm B PoepplDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5992-5695
Martin SchecklmannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Katrin SakreidaDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Michael LandgrebeDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, kbo-Lech-Mangfall-Klinik Agatharied, Hausham, Germany.
Berthold LangguthDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Simon B EickhoffInstitute for Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6363-2759
University of Regensburg · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEKrankenhaus Agatharied · DERWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive brain stimulation can reduce the severity of tinnitus phantom sounds beyond the time of stimulation by inducing regional neuroplastic changes. However, there are no good clinical predictors for treatment outcome. We used machine learning to investigate whether brain anatomy can predict therapeutic outcome. Sixty-one chronic tinnitus patients received repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of left dorsolateral prefrontal and temporal cortex. Before repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, a structural magnetic resonance image was obtained from all patients. To predict individual treatment response in new subjects, we employed a support vector machine ensemble for individual out-of-sample prediction. In the cross-validation, the support vector machine ensemble based on stratified sub-sampling and feature selection yielded an area under the curve of 0.87 for prediction of therapy success in new, previously unseen subjects. This corresponded to a balanced accuracy of 83.5%, sensitivity of 77.2% and specificity of 87.2%. Investigating the most selected features showed the involvement of the auditory cortex but also revealed a network of non-auditory brain areas. These findings suggest that idiosyncratic brain patterns accurately predict individual responses to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for tinnitus. Our findings may hence pave the way for future investigations into the precision treatment of tinnitus, involving automatic identification of the appropriate treatment method for the individual patient.

Indexed as

machine learningmagnetic resonance imagingphantom soundspredictiontinnitus

Identifiers

PMID34396100
PMCPMC8361389
OpenAlexW3167357374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.