Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34395937›Full record

ArticleJournal of the anus, rectum and colon2021

Risk Factors for Outlet Obstruction in Patients with Diverting Ileostomy Following Rectal Surgery.

Tomoki Abe, Junichi Nishimura, Masayoshi Yasui, Chu Matsuda, Naotsugu Haraguchi, Nozomu Nakai, Hiroshi Wada, Hidenori Takahashi, Takeshi Omori, Hiroshi Miyata and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tomoki AbeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Junichi NishimuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Masayoshi YasuiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Chu MatsudaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Naotsugu HaraguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Nozomu NakaiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroshi WadaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Hidenori TakahashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Takeshi OmoriDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroshi MiyataDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Masayuki OhueDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAnastomotic leakage is one of the most severe complications of rectal cancer surgery. A diverting ileostomy was constructed for the purpose of reducing anastomotic failure risk. Outlet obstruction (OO) is one of the complications of diverting stoma that results in a lack of fecal discharge from the stoma. Detailed etiologies and preventive measures for outlet obstruction have not yet been identified.

methodsWe studied 125 patients who underwent rectal resection, anastomosis, and elective ileostomy. We evaluated the incidence of outlet obstruction and looked for any relationship between perioperative factors and outlet obstruction.

resultsOutlet obstruction was detected in 20 cases (16.0%). Outlet obstruction occurred 9 days after surgery in most cases. Inserting a decompressing tube improved obstructive symptoms in 4 days. Patients were divided into two cohorts according to the occurrence of outlet obstruction. Postoperative hospital stay was longer in the outlet obstruction group (19 vs. 15 days; p = 0.0003). A multivariate analysis identified that younger patients, a postoperative thicker rectus abdominis muscle at the stoma passage and high output syndrome were independent risk factors for outlet obstruction.

conclusionsYounger patients, a postoperative thicker rectus abdominis muscle at stoma passage and high output syndrome were independent risk factors for outlet obstruction.

Indexed as

diverting stomahigh output syndromeoutlet obstructionrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID34395937
PMCPMC8321594
OpenAlexW3187706531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.