Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34395902›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2021

Comparative evaluation of efficacy of external vibrating device and counterstimulation on child's dental anxiety and pain perception during local anesthetic administration: a clinical trial.

Varada Sahithi, Kanamarlapudi Venkata Saikiran, Mahesh Nunna, Sainath Reddy Elicherla, Ramasubba Reddy Challa, Sivakumar Nuvvula

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Varada SahithiDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive dentistry, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4673-7676
Kanamarlapudi Venkata SaikiranDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive dentistry, SVS Institute of Dental Sciences, Mahabubnagar, Telangana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4949-9693
Mahesh NunnaDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive dentistry, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1477-1714
Sainath Reddy ElicherlaDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive dentistry, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6965-5262
Ramasubba Reddy ChallaDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive dentistry, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0987-4316
Sivakumar NuvvulaDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive dentistry, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1204-5551

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of external vibrating devices and counterstimulation on a child's dental anxiety, apprehension, and pain perception during local anesthetic administration.

methodsThis was a prospective, randomized, parallel-arm, single-blinded interventional, clinical trial. One hundred children aged 4-11 years, requiring pulp therapy or extraction under local anesthesia (LA), were recruited and allocated equally into two groups (1:1) based on the interventions used: Group BD (n = 50) received vibration using a Buzzy® device {MMJ Labs, Atlanta, GE, USA} as a behavior guidance technique; Group CS (n = 50) received counterstimulation for the same technique. Anxiety levels [Venham's Clinical Anxiety Rating Scale (VCARS), Venham Picture Test (VPT), Pulse oximeter {Gibson, Fingertip Pulse Oximeter}, Beijing, China)] were assessed before, during, and after LA administration, while pain perception [Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)] was evaluated immediately after injection. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t-test to assess the mean difference between the two groups and the repeated measures ANOVA for testing the mean difference in the pulse rates. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

resultsSignificant differences in mean pulse rate values were observed in both groups. In contrast, the children in the BD group had higher diminution (P < 0.05), whereas the mean VCARS and VPT scores were conspicuous (P < 0.05). Based on the mean WBFPS and VAS scores, delayed pain perception after LA injection was more prominent in the BD group than in the CS group.

conclusionExternal vibration using a Buzzy® device is comparatively better than counterstimulation in alleviating needle-associated anxiety in children requiring extraction and pulpectomy.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaChildDental AnxietyPainPulpectomyVibration

Identifiers

PMID34395902
PMCPMC8349674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.