Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34395715›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2021

Virtual Recruitment Is Here to Stay: A Survey of ID Fellowship Program Directors and Matched Applicants Regarding Their 2020 Virtual Recruitment Experiences.

Danica Rockney, Constance A Benson, Brian G Blackburn, Lisa M Chirch, Victoria J L Konold, Vera P Luther, Raymund R Razonable, Sean Tackett, Michael T Melia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ten sustainable steps infectious diseases professionals can take to mitigate the climate crisis.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluation of the Content of Ophthalmology Fellowship Program Web sites.Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Danica RockneyDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Constance A BensonDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California, USA.
Brian G BlackburnDivision of Infectious Diseases & Geographic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Lisa M ChirchDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Victoria J L KonoldDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Vera P LutherDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Raymund R RazonableDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5248-0227
Sean TackettJohns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Michael T MeliaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0147-3446

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGraduate Medical Education training programs transitioned to all-virtual recruitment in 2020. Limited data have been published regarding the consequences of this transition. We aimed to understand (1) infectious diseases (ID) fellowship programs' recruitment efforts and the effect of virtual recruitment on application and interview numbers and (2) the number of programs to which matched applicants applied and interviewed and applicants' perspectives on virtual recruitment.

methodsIn 2020-2021, we surveyed all US ID fellowship program directors (PDs) and matched applicants. Descriptive data analysis was performed on quantitative survey items. Free-text responses were analyzed through a quantitative content analysis approach.

resultsThe PD response rate was 68/158 (43%); the applicant response rate was at least 23% (85/365). PDs reported a 27% increase in mean number of applications received and a 45% increase in mean number of applicants interviewed compared with the previous year. Applicants especially valued the online program structure information, PD program overview videos, didactic and curriculum content, and fellow testimonials and profiles. Most applicants preferred interviews lasting no more than 40 minutes and interview days lasting no more than 5 hours. Nearly all (60/64, 94%) PDs adequately learned about candidates; most (48/64, 75%) felt unable to showcase their program as well as when in-person. Most PDs (54/64, 84%) and applicants (56/73, 77%) want an option for virtual recruitment.

conclusionsVirtual recruitment enabled programs to accommodate more applicants and highlighted applicants' preferences for programs' augmented online presences and time-limited interview days. Most programs and applicants want an option for virtual interviews.

Indexed as

fellowship programssurveyvirtual recruitment

Identifiers

PMID34395715
PMCPMC8360240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.