ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2021
Organizational behaviour management in clinical laboratory: A literature review.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe clinical laboratories require organizational behavior management approach that creates a balance between directors' expectations and staffs' needs in this field. This study was aimed to explain the role of organizational behavior management in clinical laboratories and suggest mechanisms for its implementation in these organizations. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this research, using several Persian and English databases by keywords consist of the clinical laboratory, organizational behavior management, and staff diversity. Three hundred and fifty four references from 1990 to 2020 were studied, and 72 references, including abstracts and full papers utilized for this research, and excluded papers presented at conferences, seminars, and dissertations. Using MESH strategy and Pico's instruction.
resultsThe results of studies revealed staffs' individual differences in all aspects, including early and secondary dimensions may influenced the style of leadership implemented in clinical laboratories, "job-personality compatibility theory," job satisfaction and job commitment of staffs work in clinical laboratories and the way the directors and managers can develop the job loyalty and improve the organizational productivity in these organizations.
conclusionIt is suggested a conceptual model for understanding and assessing the different organizational behaviors of clinical laboratories staffs based on communication skills, staffs' interaction, and socio-political, economic, and cultural elements, which should be more developed in future using the other similar studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.