Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34395542›Full record

ReviewKidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Bone Quality in CKD Patients: Current Concepts and Future Directions - Part I.

Kamyar Asadipooya, Mohamed Abdalbary, Yahya Ahmad, Elijah Kakani, Marie-Claude Monier-Faugere, Amr El-Husseini

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mixed uremic osteodystrophy: an ill-described common bone pathology in patients with chronic kidney disease.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Secondary Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Kamyar AsadipooyaDivision of Endocrinology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Mohamed AbdalbaryDivision of Nephrology & Bone and Mineral Metabolism, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Yahya AhmadDivision of Nephrology & Bone and Mineral Metabolism, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Elijah KakaniDivision of Nephrology & Bone and Mineral Metabolism, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Marie-Claude Monier-FaugereDivision of Nephrology & Bone and Mineral Metabolism, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Amr El-HusseiniDivision of Nephrology & Bone and Mineral Metabolism, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is ample evidence that patients with CKD have an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures. Bone fragility is not only influenced by low bone volume and mass but also by poor microarchitecture and tissue quality. More emphasis has been given to the quantitative rather than qualitative assessment of bone health, both in general population and CKD patients. Although bone mineral density (BMD) is a very useful clinical tool in assessing bone strength, it may underestimate the fracture risk in CKD patients. Serum and urinary bone biomarkers have been found to be reflective of bone activities and predictive of fractures independently of BMD in CKD patients. Bone quality and fracture risk in CKD patients can be better assessed by utilizing new technologies such as trabecular bone score and high-resolution imaging studies. Additionally, invasive assessments such as bone histology and micro-indentation are useful counterparts in the evaluation of bone quality. SUMMARY: A precise diagnosis of the underlying skeletal abnormalities in CKD patients is crucial to prevent further bone loss and fractures. We must consider bone quantity and quality abnormalities for management of CKD patients. Here in this part I, we are focusing on advances in bone quality diagnostics that are expected to help in proper understanding of the bone health in CKD patients. KEY MESSAGES: Assessment of bone quality and quantity in CKD patients is essential. Both noninvasive and invasive techniques for the assessment of bone quality are available.

Indexed as

Bone mineral densityBone qualityChronic kidney disease

Identifiers

PMID34395542
PMCPMC8314761
OpenAlexW3182456464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.