Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34395162›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of STEM education2021

Am I getting through? Surveying students on what messages they recall from the first day of STEM classes.

Clara L Meaders, Lillian G Senn, Brian A Couch, A Kelly Lane, Marilyne Stains, MacKenzie R Stetzer, Erin Vinson, Michelle K Smith

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of STEM education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Clara L MeadersSection of Cell and Developmental Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA.
Lillian G SennDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, E145 Corson Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA.
Brian A CouchSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA.
A Kelly LaneDepartment of Biology Teaching and Learning, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA.
Marilyne StainsDepartment of Chemistry, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA.
MacKenzie R StetzerDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469 USA.
Erin VinsonMaine Center for Research in STEM Education, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469 USA.
Michelle K SmithDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, E145 Corson Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7721-7417
Cornell University · USUniversity of Maine · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe first day of class helps students learn about what to expect from their instructors and courses. Messaging used by instructors, which varies in content and approach on the first day, shapes classroom social dynamics and can affect subsequent learning in a course. Prior work established the non-content Instructor Talk Framework to describe the language that instructors use to create learning environments, but little is known about the extent to which students detect those messages. In this study, we paired first day classroom observation data with results from student surveys to measure how readily students in introductory STEM courses detect non-content Instructor Talk.

resultsTo learn more about the instructor and student first day experiences, we studied 11 introductory STEM courses at two different institutions. The classroom observation data were used to characterize course structure and use of non-content Instructor Talk. The data revealed that all instructors spent time discussing their instructional practices, building instructor/student relationships, and sharing strategies for success with their students. After class, we surveyed students about the messages their instructors shared during the first day of class and determined that the majority of students from within each course detected messaging that occurred at a higher frequency. For lower frequency messaging, we identified nuances in what students detected that may help instructors as they plan their first day of class.

conclusionsFor instructors who dedicate the first day of class to establishing positive learning environments, these findings provide support that students are detecting the messages. Additionally, this study highlights the importance of instructors prioritizing the messages they deem most important and giving them adequate attention to more effectively reach students. Setting a positive classroom environment on the first day may lead to long-term impacts on student motivation and course retention. These outcomes are relevant for all students, but in particular for students in introductory STEM courses which are often critical prerequisites for being in a major. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40594-021-00306-y.

Indexed as

Classroom observationsFirst dayMessagingNon-content Instructor TalkSTEM coursesUndergraduate

Identifiers

PMID34395162
PMCPMC8344324
OpenAlexW3190274836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.