Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34395137›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Sonographic Findings of Left Ventricular Dysfunction to Predict Shock Type in Undifferentiated Hypotensive Patients: An Analysis From the Sonography in Hypotension and Cardiac Arrest in the Emergency Department (SHoC-ED) Study.

Sam Keefer, Paul Atkinson, Kavish Chandra, Ryan J Henneberry, Paul A Olszynski, Mandy Peach, Laura Diegelmann, Hein Lamprecht, Melanie Stander, David Lussier and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sam KeeferFaculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, CAN.
Paul AtkinsonEmergency Medicine, Horizon Health Network, Saint John, CAN.
Kavish ChandraEmergency Medicine, Dalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, Saint John, CAN.
Ryan J HenneberryEmergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, CAN.
Paul A OlszynskiEmergency Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, CAN.
Mandy PeachEmergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Saint John, CAN.
Laura DiegelmannEmergency Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA.
Hein LamprechtEmergency Medicine, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, ZAF.
Melanie StanderEmergency Medicine, Mediclinic, Cape Town, ZAF.
David LussierEmergency Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, CAN.
Chau PhamEmergency Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, CAN.
James MilneFamily Medicine, Fraser Valley Health, Vancouver, CAN.
Jacqueline FraserEmergency Medicine, Horizon Health Network, Saint John, CAN.
David LewisEmergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Saint John, CAN.
Dalhousie University · CAHorizon Health Network · CASaint John Regional Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Patients that present to the emergency department (ED) with undifferentiated hypotension have a high mortality rate. Hypotension can be divided into four categories: obstructive, hypovolemic, distributive, and cardiogenic. While it is possible to have overlapping or concomitant shock states, being able to differentiate between cardiogenic shock and the other categories is important as it entails a different treatment regime and extra cautions. In this secondary analysis, we investigate if using focused cardiac ultrasonography (FOCUS) to determine left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) can serve as a reliable test for cardiogenic shock. Methods We prospectively collected FOCUS findings performed in 135 ED patients with undifferentiated hypotension as part of an international study. Patients with clearly identified etiologies for hypotension were excluded, along with other specific presumptive diagnoses. LVD was defined as the identification of a generally hypodynamic left ventricle in the setting of shock. FOCUS findings were collected using a standardized protocol and data collection form. All scans were performed by emergency physicians trained in ultrasound. Final shock type was defined as cardiogenic or noncardiogenic by independent specialist blinded chart review. Results In our findings, 135 patients had complete records for assessment of left ventricular function and additional follow-up data and so were included in this secondary analysis. The median age was 56 years and 53% of patients were male. Disease prevalence for cardiogenic shock was 12% and the mortality rate was 24%. The presence of LVD on FOCUS had a sensitivity of 62.50% (95% confidence interval 35.43% to 84.80%), specificity of 94.12% (88.26% to 97.60%), positive likelihood ratio (LR) 10.62 (4.71 to 23.95), negative LR 0.40 (0.21 to 0.75) and accuracy of 90.37% (84.10% to 94.77%) for detecting cardiogenic shock. Conclusion Detecting left ventricular dysfunction on FOCUS may be useful in the early identification of cardiogenic shock in otherwise undifferentiated hypotensive adult patients in the emergency department.

Indexed as

emergency medicinehypotensionleft ventricular functionpoint of care ultrasoundshock

Identifiers

PMID34395137
PMCPMC8360322
OpenAlexW3180203586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.