ArticleCureus2021
Frequency of Urinary Tract Infections, Gonorrhea, and Chlamydia in Emergency Department Patients With Acute Scrotal Pain.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute scrotal pain has many causes. According to the American Urological Association recommendations: history, physical examination, and ultrasound are key in diagnosing acute scrotal pain.
objectiveThe primary objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency of urinary tract infections (UTI) on routine Urinalysis (UA) in patients presenting with acute scrotal pain to the emergency department (ED).
methodsWe conducted a multicentered retrospective chart review of patients who presented to the ED with acute scrotal pain. Patient visits from February 1, 2018 to November 1, 2019 from 13 EDs were analyzed. Demographic data, UA interpretation, urine culture, gonorrhea and chlamydia (GC) testing, clinical findings, treatment outcomes, and ultrasounds were recorded. Patients who did not have a UA and scrotal ultrasound performed or who had a diagnosis of scrotal cellulitis or soft tissue infection were excluded.
resultsThere were 2,392 patients included in the study. A UTI was present in 173 (7.2%) patients. Of the patients who were found to have a UTI, 100/173 (57.8%) had a concomitant ultrasound diagnosis of epididymitis/orchitis. Also, 731 patients underwent GC testing in addition to standard UA collection, and ultrasound, seven were positive for gonorrhea (0.95%), and 30 were positive for chlamydia (4.10%).
conclusionsRoutine UA collection of patients presenting to the ED with acute scrotal pain should be considered, especially in patients with a concomitant ultrasound diagnosis of epididymo-orchitis. GC testing has limited yield without symptoms suggestive of sexually transmitted infections and a normal ultrasound.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.