Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34395091›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2021

Nurses' knowledge, attitude, and competence regarding palliative and end-of-life care: a path analysis.

Hung-Yu Lin, Chun-I Chen, Chu-Yun Lu, Shu-Chuan Lin, Chiung-Yu Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hung-Yu LinSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC.
Chun-I ChenManagement College, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chu-Yun LuDepartment of Nursing, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Shu-Chuan LinDepartment of Nursing, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chiung-Yu HuangDepartment of Nursing, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNurses' knowledge regarding palliative and end-of-life (EOL) care has been documented, but the competence of nurses in Taiwan has not been deeply analyzed and may affect the use of EOL care. PURPOSE: We aimed to (1) assess the palliative care knowledge, competence and attitude of nurses in a general hospital and (2) examine the paths connecting nurses' demographic characteristics, previous experiences, knowledge, competence, and attitude.

methodA correlational, cross-sectional survey design was implemented to recruit 682 eligible nurses. The questionnaires included demographic information and palliative and EOL care knowledge, attitude, and competence scales. Path analysis was employed for statistical analysis using structural equation modeling.

resultsOverall, 76% of the questions assessing palliative and hospice knowledge were answered correctly. Nurses' palliative attitudes were divided into "positive perception" and "negative perception". "Positive perception" was highly correlated with competence (

conclusionsThis study suggests continuing education to decrease nurses' "negative perception" attitude regarding the provision of information to patients and families to provide better palliative and EOL care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Nurses' attitudes and competences with respect to palliative care and EOL care are critical. Areas for further research and advanced palliative and EOL care-related education and training are suggested and may be applied in future clinical interventions.

Indexed as

AttitudeEnd-of-lifePalliative knowledgeSelf-competence

Identifiers

PMID34395091
PMCPMC8320516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.