Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34395035›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric intensive care2021

Endotracheal Tube Placement Confirmation with Bedside Ultrasonography in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Validation Study.

Harsha K Chandnani, Ivanna N Maxson, Disha K Mittal, Salem Dehom, Anthony Moretti, Vi A Dinh, Merrick Lopez, Janeth C Ejike

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric intensive care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. FOCUS more on POCUS.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Harsha K ChandnaniDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, California, United States.
Ivanna N MaxsonDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, California, United States.
Disha K MittalDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, California, United States.
Salem DehomGraduate Department, Loma Linda University School of Nursing, Loma Linda, California, United States.
Anthony MorettiDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, California, United States.
Vi A DinhDepartment of Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California, United States.
Merrick LopezDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, California, United States.
Janeth C EjikeDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, California, United States.
Loma Linda University Children's Hospital · USLoma Linda University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critically ill patients who are intubated undergo multiple chest X-rays (CXRs) to determine endotracheal tube position; however, other modalities can save time, medical expenses, and radiation exposure. In this article, we evaluated the validity and interrater reliability of ultrasound to confirm endotracheal tube (ETT) position in patients. A prospective study was performed on intubated patients with cuffed ETTs. The accuracy of ultrasound to confirm correct ETT placement in 92 patients was 97.8%. Sensitivity, positive predictive value, and agreement of 97.7, 93.3, and 91.3% were found on comparing ultrasound to CXR findings. Ultrasound is feasible, reliable, and has good interrater reliability in assessing correct ETT position in children.

Indexed as

endotracheal intubationradiationultrasound

Identifiers

PMID34395035
PMCPMC8354344
OpenAlexW3080100150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.