ReviewJournal of ophthalmology2021
Accuracy of Deep Learning Algorithms for the Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity by Fundus Images: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning algorithms for timely diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity requiring treatment.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- A novel method of quantifying retinal vascular tortuosity in retinopathy of prematurity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence in retinal disease: clinical application, challenges, and future directions.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023Review
- Development and international validation of custom-engineered and code-free deep-learning models for detection of plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity: a retrospective study.The Lancet. Digital health · 2023Article
- GabROP: Gabor Wavelets-Based CAD for Retinopathy of Prematurity Diagnosis via Convolutional Neural Networks.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The diagnostic value of electrocardiogram-based machine learning in long QT syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Association of Optical Coherence Tomography-Measured Fibrovascular Ridge Thickness and Clinical Disease Stage in Retinopathy of Prematurity.JAMA ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Retinopathy of Prematurity: Validation of a Vascular Severity Scale against International Expert Diagnosis.Ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Trends in Neonatal Ophthalmic Screening Methods.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The upcoming role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for retinal and glaucomatous diseases.Journal of optometry · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetinopathy of prematurity (ROP) occurs in preterm infants and may contribute to blindness. Deep learning (DL) models have been used for ophthalmologic diagnoses. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published evidence to summarize and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of DL algorithms for ROP by fundus images.
methodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Xplore Digital Library on June 13, 2021, for studies using a DL algorithm to distinguish individuals with ROP of different grades, which provided accuracy measurements. The pooled sensitivity and specificity values and the area under the curve (AUC) of summary receiver operating characteristics curves (SROC) summarized overall test performance. The performances in validation and test datasets were assessed together and separately. Subgroup analyses were conducted between the definition and grades of ROP. Threshold and nonthreshold effects were tested to assess biases and evaluate accuracy factors associated with DL models.
resultsNine studies with fifteen classifiers were included in our meta-analysis. A total of 521,586 objects were applied to DL models. For combined validation and test datasets in each study, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.953 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.946-0.959) and 0.975 (0.973-0.977), respectively, and the AUC was 0.984 (0.978-0.989). For the validation dataset and test dataset, the AUC was 0.977 (0.968-0.986) and 0.987 (0.982-0.992), respectively. In the subgroup analysis of ROP vs. normal and differentiation of two ROP grades, the AUC was 0.990 (0.944-0.994) and 0.982 (0.964-0.999), respectively.
conclusionsOur study shows that DL models can play an essential role in detecting and grading ROP with high sensitivity, specificity, and repeatability. The application of a DL-based automated system may improve ROP screening and diagnosis in the future.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.