Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34394910›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in drug safety2021

Monitoring the manufacturing and quality of medicines: a fundamental task of pharmacovigilance.

Marco Sardella, Glyn Belcher, Calin Lungu, Terenzio Ignoni, Manuela Camisa, Doris Irene Stenver, Paolo Porcelli, Margherita D'Antuono, Nicola Gian Castiglione, Anna Adams and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pharmacovigilance and Appropriate Drug Use.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 15 institutions in 8 countries.

Marco SardellaChief Pharmacovigilance Officer, EU&UK QPPV, Adienne Srl. S.U., Via Galileo Galilei, 19, Caponago 20867 Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3477-7291
Glyn BelcherPV Consultancy Ltd., London, UK.
Calin LunguDrug Development Consulting Services Sa, Luxemburg City, Luxemburg.
Terenzio IgnoniSVP Quality and CMC, GAIN Therapeutics, Lugano, Switzerland.
Manuela CamisaAdienne Srl. S.U., Caponago, Italy.
Doris Irene StenverUnique Advice, EMA, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Paolo PorcelliItalian Medicines Agency (AIFA), Rome, Italy.
Margherita D'AntuonoItalfarmaco, Cinisello Balsamo, Italy.
Nicola Gian CastiglioneChiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Parma, Italy.
Anna AdamsMedicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), London, UK.
Giovanni FurlanPfizer Italia S.r.l., Milano, Italy.
Ilaria GrisoniJazz Pharmaceuticals, Villa Guardia, Italy.
Sarah HallMIPSOL, London, UK.
Laura BogaDompè farmaceutici S.p.A., Milano, Italy.
Valentina ManciniShionogi Europe, Rome, Italy.
Mircea CiucaCSL Behring, Bern, Switzerland.
David ChonziInstil Bio, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Brian EdwardsNDA Group AB, Ashtead, UK.
Arduino A MangoniDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Marco TuccoriUniversity Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Elena ProkofyevaDivision Research & Development, DG PRE Authorisation, Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products (FAMHP), Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Fabio De GregorioShionogi Europe, London, UK.
Mario Bertazzoli Grabinski BroglioHelsinn Healthcare SA, Lugano, Switzerland.
Bert van LeeuwenAstellas Pharma Europe, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Paola KrugerEuropean Patient's Academy on Therapeutic Innovation (EUPATI), Rome, Italy.
Christian RauschUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.
Hervé Le LouetUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala Monitoring Centre · SEAshtead Hospital · GBAstellas Pharma (Netherlands) · NLAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITChiesi (Italy) · ITCooperative Educational Service Agencies · USCSL (Switzerland) · CHDompé (Italy) · ITFlinders University · AUHelsinn (Switzerland) · CHItalfarmaco (Italy) · ITItalian Medicines Agency · ITJazz Pharmaceuticals (Italy) · ITPfizer (Italy) · ITSciensano (Belgium) · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The collection and assessment of individual case safety reports (ICSRs) is important to detect unknown adverse drug reactions particularly in the first decade after approval of new chemical entities. However, regulations require that these activities are routinely undertaken for all medicinal products, including older medicines such as generic medicinal products with a well-established safety profile. For the latter, the risk management plans no longer contain important risks, considered important safety concerns, on the basis that routine pharmacovigilance activity would not allow their further characterisation. Society assumes that unexpected adverse reactions causally related to pharmacological activity are very unlikely to be detected for such well-established medicines, but important risks can still occur. For these products, a change in the safety profile which is brand or source specific and usually local in nature, associated with failures with the adequate control of quality of manufacturing or distribution are important safety issues. These may be the consequence of manufacturing and pharmacovigilance quality systems that are not fully integrated over the product life cycle (e.g. inadequate control of quality defects affecting one or multiple batches; inadequate impact assessment of change/variation of manufacturing, quality control testing, storage and distribution processes; inadequate control over the distribution channels including the introduction of counterfeit or falsified products into the supply chain). Drug safety hazards caused by the above-mentioned issues have been identified with different products and formulations, from small molecules to complex molecules such as biological products extracted from animal sources, biosimilars and advanced therapy medicinal products. The various phases of the drug manufacturing and distribution of pharmaceutical products require inputs from pharmacovigilance to assess any effects of quality-related issues and to identify proportionate risk minimisation measures that often have design implications for a medicine which requires a close link between proactive vigilance and good manufacturing practice. To illustrate our argument for closer organisational integration, some examples of drug safety hazards originating from quality, manufacturing and distribution issues are discussed. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY:

Indexed as

adverse drug reactioncounterfeitfalsifiedGDPGMPGVPlack of efficacymanufacturingpharmacovigilanceproduct quality complaintsproduct recallquality defectsafetyside effects

Identifiers

PMID34394910
PMCPMC8361554
OpenAlexW3188252044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.