Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34394891›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021

Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Testing Kit for Vaginal Infection Diagnosis.

Ching-Ju Shen, Chung-Yao Yang, Huan-Yun Chen, Wei-Chun Chen, Ting-Chang Chang, Chao-Min Cheng

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mucosa-interfacing electronics.Nature reviews. Materials · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ching-Ju ShenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital and Pojen Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chung-Yao YangHygeia Touch Inc., Taipei, Taiwan.
Huan-Yun ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Wei-Chun ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Branch, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ting-Chang ChangHygeia Touch Inc., Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1870-7453
Chao-Min ChengInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8644-1960
National Tsing Hua University · TWChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWKaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWKaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaginitis is a common disorder among women of varying ages that arises from a change in the normal pH balance of vaginal bacteria or an infection. Characteristic symptoms of itching, irritation, and odor cause considerable discomfort and increase the risk of contracting other sexually transmitted infections. Because of the sensitive and personal nature of the condition, some women may be reluctant to seek treatment. This behavior not only fails to solve the problem but may also delay medical treatment and result in additional medical complications. The pH changes associated with vaginitis and vaginosis, which are characterized by the presence or absence of inflammation, respectively, are well known but can vary. For example, bacterial vaginosis and trichomoniasis infection will raise vaginal pH above 4.5, while vulvovaginal candidiasis does not result in any measurable change to pH. Nonetheless, diagnostic tools relying on pH measurement are a valuable approach from which additional testing and treatment may be launched. Here, we focused on the use of a vaginal self-test tool and tested 50 patients, including pregnant women. When used according to the instructions, the Hygeia Touch Self-Testing Kit for Vaginal Infection demonstrated over 88% accuracy compared to a clinical diagnostic workup, with a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 89% in the patients where the swab was correctly interpreted. This study demonstrated an effective self-test method with high acceptability among women that provided them with greater autonomy regarding health management.

Indexed as

Candidiasis, VulvovaginalVaginosis, BacterialFemaleHumansPregnancySelf-Testing

Identifiers

PMID34394891
PMCPMC8363453
OpenAlexW3190749419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.