ArticleAcademic forensic pathology2019
When Cultures Fail: Postmortem Decoy Receptor 3 (DcR3) as a Marker of Antemortem Sepsis.
Article in Academic forensic pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoy receptor 3 as a prognostic biomarker for sepsis and septic shock according to the Sepsis-3 definitions.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Sudden Death: A Practical Autopsy Approach to Unexplained Mediastinitis Due to Fatal Untreated Neck Infections-A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Research Progress of DcR3 in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Sepsis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDecoy receptor 3 (DcR3) has shown utility as a reliable surrogate marker. Levels of DcR3 in the serum increase and remain elevated in several disease states including cancer and sepsis. In inflammatory conditions, DcR3 is upregulated in inflammatory cells to suppress exponential immune propagation. The use of DcR3 as an indication of sepsis has been documented in the antemortem setting, but its use in the postmortem setting is unknown. The purpose of this study is to evaluate postmortem DcR3 as a marker of antemortem sepsis.
methodsA retrospective investigation was performed to identify patients whose primary cause of death fell into one of four cohorts (control, cancer, culture-positive sepsis, and suspected culture-negative sepsis). Serum was obtained and tested by a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to quantify DcR3 levels.
resultsTwenty-five of 47 samples contained detectable levels of DcR3 (average 0.75 ± 0.3 ng/mL). Comparing culture-positive sepsis to the control cohort at a cutoff value of 0.26 ng/mL, DcR3 positivity showed a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 73%. Compared to each other, patients with cancer had similar values to those with culture-positive sepsis (P = .90). Time of specimen collection had a negative role in detection and quantification (P = .038). DISCUSSION: Several studies have shown DcR3 may be a viable antemortem biomarker of sepsis, but its use in postmortem sepsis testing has not been adequately investigated. This study shows that in postmortem testing, DcR3 shows less sensitivity and specificity with a relatively short window for proper testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.