ReviewShoulder & elbow2021
Lateralized versus nonlateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Review in Shoulder & elbow, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical outcome of combined reverse total shoulder arthroplasty combined with pectoralis major transfer for rotator cuff arthropathy: a preliminary study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Article
- Shoulder Physiological Offset Parameters in Asian Populations-A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Risk factors for infection after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty - A systematic review with meta-analysis.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- Surgical decisions on implant-related parameters can enhance knowledge transfer for glenoid bone grafting in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a scoping review of heterogeneity sources.EFORT open reviews · 2024Article
- Glenoid lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: metal vs. bone offset in different implant designs.JSES international · 2024Article
- Subscapularis repair in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and descriptive synthesis of cadaveric biomechanical strength outcomes.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Throughout the history of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, the extent of lateral offset has changed considerably from "too lateral" to "too medial" and has been lately swinging back towards a point somewhere in between. Nonlateralized designs minimize shear forces on the glenoid and decrease force required by the deltoid. Glenoid lateralization decreases impingement and scapular notching and improves range of motion. Humeral lateralization achieves a more anatomic position of the tuberosities while maintaining a nonlateralized center of rotation. Several factors play a role in choosing the extent of lateral offset and method of lateralization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.