ReviewObstetric medicine2021
Perinatal epidemiology: Issues, challenges, and potential solutions.
Review in Obstetric medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A technical framework for using electronic medical records to create and maintain a cross-sectional research cohort of pregnant people in the Gulf South.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- The Scottish medicines in pregnancy programme: supporting the surveillance of medicines use during pregnancy and assessment of associated clinical outcomes.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Evidence-based directed acyclic graphs for perinatal pharmacoepidemiologic studies in rheumatology: a structured approach for development and implementation in administrative health data.Frontiers in epidemiology · 2026Article
- Pregnancy, baby, and childhood outcomes from using anti-seizure medication during pregnancy.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Scoping review of biosimilar disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in pregnancy: evidence gaps and proposed outcome reporting framework.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Therapeutic Management of Vestibular Disorders During Pregnancy: A Narrative and Evidence-Based Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- The effects of developmental cadmium exposure on health and disease.Disease models & mechanisms · 2025Review
- Prenatal exposures to endocrine disrupting chemicals: The role of multi-omics in understanding toxicity.Molecular and cellular endocrinology · 2023Review
- Prediction of pre-eclampsia.Obstetric medicine · 2021Review
- Dual Trigger with Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonist and Human Chorionic Gonadotropin of Fresh Autologous Cycles in High Responders: A Systematic Review.Journal of reproduction & infertilityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perinatal epidemiology research is concerned with identifying the effects of events during pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes that include maternal, fetal, and neonatal health outcomes. Randomized trials in perinatal research face many challenges, including randomization difficulties, ethical considerations, and inadequate statistical power due to the small number of subjects eligible for participation. For these reasons, most epidemiological studies conducted in this research field are observational and include different types of bias. This review describes the key methodological difficulties in the design and analysis of randomized and observational studies in perinatal epidemiology, and provides potential corrective approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.