Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34394658›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in nursing : JRN2020

An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research.

Louise Doyle, Catherine McCabe, Brian Keogh, Annemarie Brady, Margaret McCann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in nursing : JRN, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 704 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
704citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
52.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

704 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1,632 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. "Part of a cog, of a system; a system that's broken": social workers' experiences of moral injury in England.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Psychosocial and supportive care in radiation therapy: a qualitative comparison of Norway and Canada.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  15. Exploring the understanding and management of anxiety from cancer in Latino/a older adults and their caregivers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

644 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Louise DoyleAssociate Professor in Mental Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0153-8326
Catherine McCabeAssociate Professor in General Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Brian KeoghAssistant Professor in Mental Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Annemarie BradyChair of Nursing and Chronic Illness, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Margaret McCannAssistant Professor in General Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7925-6396
Trinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQualitative descriptive designs are common in nursing and healthcare research due to their inherent simplicity, flexibility and utility in diverse healthcare contexts. However, the application of descriptive research is sometimes critiqued in terms of scientific rigor. Inconsistency in decision making within the research process coupled with a lack of transparency has created issues of credibility for this type of approach. It can be difficult to clearly differentiate what constitutes a descriptive research design from the range of other methodologies at the disposal of qualitative researchers.

aimsThis paper provides an overview of qualitative descriptive research, orientates to the underlying philosophical perspectives and key characteristics that define this approach and identifies the implications for healthcare practice and policy. METHODS AND

resultsUsing real-world examples from healthcare research, the paper provides insight to the practical application of descriptive research at all stages of the design process and identifies the critical elements that should be explicit when applying this approach.

conclusionsBy adding to the existing knowledge base, this paper enhances the information available to researchers who wish to use the qualitative descriptive approach, influencing the standard of how this approach is employed in healthcare research.

Indexed as

descriptive researchmethodologynursing researchqualitative researchresearch methods

Identifiers

PMID34394658
PMCPMC7932381
OpenAlexW2995660892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.