ArticleJournal of research in nursing : JRN2019
Unlocking intuition and expertise: using interpretative phenomenological analysis to explore clinical decision making.
Article in Journal of research in nursing : JRN, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conceptual Anchors in Longitudinal Qualitative Health Research: Using a Methodological Adjunct in Longitudinal Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Structured clinical approach to enable large language models to be used for improved clinical diagnosis and explainable reasoning.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Judges' views on making decisions in family law cases that feature a parent with a mental illness.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2026Article
- Exploring doctors experiences of transitioning to full time research and back to clinical practice: a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Experiences of nurse managers in preventing and managing inpatient falls: a qualitative descriptive study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- A balancing act: Primary care midwives screening for fetal growth restriction- a focus group study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Article
- "Black Women Should Not Die Giving Life": The lived experiences of Black women diagnosed with severe maternal morbidity in the United States.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2025Article
- Is It Safe Enough? An IPA Study of How Couple Therapists Make Sense of Their Decision to Either Stop or Continue with Couple Therapy When Violence Becomes the Issue.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical decision making is a complex, but important, research area. Decision-making theories have evolved to recognise that, although heuristics and biases can lead to error, expert clinician decision makers can also use intuition to good effect. More research is needed to understand how nurses and other clinicians make sense of complexity and uncertainty.
aimThis paper discusses the utility of interpretative phenomenological analysis to elucidate clinical decision making, expertise and intuition.
methodsA narrative review of published interpretative phenomenological analysis studies exploring clinical decision-making, and discussion of an exemplar study.
resultsA limited number of interpretative phenomenological analysis studies have been published in this area. By seeking out descriptions of real-world decision making, interpretative phenomenological analysis research provides ecologically valid insights into what it is like to make time-critical, high-stakes decisions with limited information.
conclusionContributing to the study of complex clinical decision making in combination with other research approaches, interpretative phenomenological analysis research has significant unrealised potential to inform education, assessment and support interventions and the development of clinical guidelines. Future applications could enhance understanding of multi-disciplinary decision-making and the development of expertise and intuition, over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.