Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34394511›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in nursing : JRN2019

Unlocking intuition and expertise: using interpretative phenomenological analysis to explore clinical decision making.

Natalie Elizabeth Anderson, Julia Slark, Merryn Gott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in nursing : JRN, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Judges' views on making decisions in family law cases that feature a parent with a mental illness.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natalie Elizabeth AndersonProfessional Teaching Fellow and Doctoral Candidate, School of Nursing, University of Auckland, New Zealand; Registered Nurse, Auckland Adult Emergency Department, Auckland District Health Board, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6852-1660
Julia SlarkSenior Lecturer, School of Nursing, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Merryn GottProfessor of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical decision making is a complex, but important, research area. Decision-making theories have evolved to recognise that, although heuristics and biases can lead to error, expert clinician decision makers can also use intuition to good effect. More research is needed to understand how nurses and other clinicians make sense of complexity and uncertainty.

aimThis paper discusses the utility of interpretative phenomenological analysis to elucidate clinical decision making, expertise and intuition.

methodsA narrative review of published interpretative phenomenological analysis studies exploring clinical decision-making, and discussion of an exemplar study.

resultsA limited number of interpretative phenomenological analysis studies have been published in this area. By seeking out descriptions of real-world decision making, interpretative phenomenological analysis research provides ecologically valid insights into what it is like to make time-critical, high-stakes decisions with limited information.

conclusionContributing to the study of complex clinical decision making in combination with other research approaches, interpretative phenomenological analysis research has significant unrealised potential to inform education, assessment and support interventions and the development of clinical guidelines. Future applications could enhance understanding of multi-disciplinary decision-making and the development of expertise and intuition, over time.

Indexed as

clinical decision makingdecision makingexpertisehealth professionalsinterpretative phenomenological analysisintuitionmethodological inquiryqualitative

Identifiers

PMID34394511
PMCPMC7932448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.