Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34394464›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in nursing : JRN2018

The evaluation of a home-based paediatric nursing service: concept and design development using the Kirkpatrick model.

Catherine Jones, Jennifer Fraser, Sue Randall

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in nursing : JRN, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Kirkpatrick Model Process Evaluation of Reactions and Learning from My Strengths Training for Life™.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Catherine JonesBA (Hons) Paediatric Nursing, RN, Grad Dip Business, Masters (Philosophy) Candidate, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, the University of Sydney, Mallett St, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Jennifer FraserPhD, Associate Professor, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, the University of Sydney, Mallett St, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Sue RandallPhD, RGN, RHV, Senior Lecturer in Primary Health Care, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, the University of Sydney, Mallett St, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA new paediatric hospital-in-the-home nursing service required evaluation.

aimsTo determine whether the education and training provided for nursing staff employed in the service was effective.

methodsThis paper presents the way in which a training evaluation model supported the design and evaluation of a training programme for registered nurses working in an out-of-hospital, home-based nursing service for paediatric patients.

resultsThe Kirkpatrick model provides a framework for evaluating the effectiveness of workforce training for any industry including healthcare (Kirkpatrick, 2009).

conclusionsThat the Kirkpatrick model is an appropriate framework to evaluate a nursing training programme, but it is imperative to evaluate all levels of the model to be able to ascertain the success of the training and the impact on clinical practice.

Indexed as

design developmentevaluatingevaluationKirkpatrick modelnursing educationtraining

Identifiers

PMID34394464
PMCPMC7932399
OpenAlexW2886152651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.