Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34394422›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in nursing : JRN2018

End-of-life care in UK care homes: a systematic review of the literature.

Adam Spacey, Janet Scammell, Michele Board, Sam Porter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in nursing : JRN, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adam SpaceyPhD student, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5833-6189
Janet ScammellAssociate Professor, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, UK.
Michele BoardPrincipal Lecturer in adult nursing, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, UK.
Sam PorterProfessor of Nursing Sociology, Head of Department of Social Sciences and Social Work, Bournemouth University, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of people requiring end-of-life care provision in care homes has grown significantly. There is a need for a systematic examination of individual studies to provide more comprehensive information about contemporary care provision.

aimThe aim of this study was to systematically review studies that describe end-of-life care in UK care homes.

methodA systematic PRISMA review of the literature published between 2008 and April 2017 was carried out. A total of 14 studies were included in the review.

resultsA number of areas of concern were identified in the literature in relation to the phases of dying during end-of-life care: end-of-life pre-planning processes; understandings of end-of-life care; and interprofessional end-of-life care provision.

conclusionsGiven that the problems identified in the literature concerning end-of-life care of residents in care homes are similar to those encountered in other healthcare environments, there is logic in considering how generalised solutions that have been proposed could be applied to the specifics of care homes. Further research is necessary to explore how barriers to good end-of-life care can be mitigated, and facilitators strengthened.

Indexed as

advance care planningend-of-life careinterprofessional practicenursing homespalliative careresidential homes

Identifiers

PMID34394422
PMCPMC7932352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.