Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34394387›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2021

Which Plants for What Ailments: A Quantitative Analysis of Medicinal Ethnobotany of Ile-Ife, Osun State, Southwestern Nigeria.

Yusuf Ola Mukaila, Olaniran Temitope Oladipo, Ifeoluwa Ogunlowo, Abdulwakeel Ayokun-Nun Ajao, Saheed Sabiu

RetractedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yusuf Ola MukailaDepartment of Botany, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife 220005, Osun State, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8535-5908
Olaniran Temitope OladipoDepartment of Botany, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife 220005, Osun State, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2957-2961
Ifeoluwa OgunlowoDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife 220005, Osun State, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0897-5879
Abdulwakeel Ayokun-Nun AjaoDepartment of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park 2006, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3820-2559
Saheed SabiuDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Science, Durban University of Technology, P.O. Box 1334, Durban 4000, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7209-9220
Obafemi Awolowo University · NGDurban University of Technology · ZAUniversity of Johannesburg · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies on medicinal ethnobotany in rural areas and communities are important for documentation and generation of indigenous knowledge on the medicinal use of plants, as well as identification of new botanicals of pharmacological significance. This paper presents, for the first time, the quantitative ethnobotanical uses of medicinal plants in Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria. The ethnobotanical survey was carried out by conducting semistructured interviews with 70 informants/collaborators. Data were analyzed using various quantitative indices, namely, Ethnobotanical Knowledge Index (EKI), Species Popularity Index (SPI), Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC), Cultural Importance Index (CII), Informant Consensus Factor (F

Identifiers

PMID34394387
PMCPMC8355999
OpenAlexW3189865934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.