Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34394282›Full record

ArticleAfrican health sciences2021

The Newcastle satisfaction with nursing scales in a Mexican Oncology Hospital.

Cecilia Rodríguez-Herrera, José de Jesús López-Jiménez, Azucena Del Toro-Valero, Nora Magdalena Torres-Carrillo, Norma Torres-Carrillo, Carlos Alberto Godínez-Peña, Ana Cecilia Méndez-Magaña, Melva Guadalupe Herrera-Godina, Ana Lilia Fletes-Rayas

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African health sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Cecilia Rodríguez-HerreraInstituto Jalisciense de Cancerología.
José de Jesús López-JiménezInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Occidente, División de Medicina Molecular.
Azucena Del Toro-ValeroInstituto Jalisciense de Cancerología.
Nora Magdalena Torres-CarrilloUniversidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Departamento de Microbiología y Patología.
Norma Torres-CarrilloUniversidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Departamento de Microbiología y Patología.
Carlos Alberto Godínez-PeñaUniversidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Departamento de Fisiología.
Ana Cecilia Méndez-MagañaUniversidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Departamento de Salud Pública.
Melva Guadalupe Herrera-GodinaUniversidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Departamento de Psicología Aplicada.
Ana Lilia Fletes-RayasUniversidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Departamento de Enfermería Clínica Aplicada.
Universidad de Guadalajara · MXInstituto Jalisciense de Cancerología · MXMexican Social Security Institute · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe principal aim of this study was to identify whether the Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scales (NSNS) could be used on cancer patients.

methodsThis was a descriptive, cross-sectional study carried out on cancer patients (n = 298).

resultsWe found that a majority of cancer patients were around 50 years old (hospitalized patients [HP]: 49.5 ± 14.9; chemotherapy outpatients [COP]: 49.4 ± 12.7), were female (HP: 74%; COP: 63.5%), and had received education at least up to elementary level (HP: 70%; COP: 80%). Breast cancer was the principal type of cancer (>34%) in both groups (HP and COP). The groups were comparable in age, sex distribution, place of origin, educational qualification, and type of cancer. Among HP, the experience and satisfaction scales of the NSNS showed good internal consistency (n = 235, α >0.9, r > 0.7), while among COP, only the satisfaction scale showed good internal consistency (n = 62, α = 1.00). Most patients' perceptions (level of satisfaction) of hospitalization and chemotherapy services were positive (98% and 97%, respectively).

conclusionAn NSNS instrument specifically designed for ambulatory care cancer patients is necessary for it to be useful in assessing cancer patients' perception of nursing care. This will help improve the quality of care in Mexico.The presence of cancer by itself could modify the patients' satisfaction level. Further large-scale studies are required to investigate the patients' perceptions of nursing care using the NSNS on different cancer patient groups.

Indexed as

Oncology NursingPatient SatisfactionPersonal SatisfactionQuality of Health CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHospitals, PublicHumansMaleMexicoMiddle AgedOncology Service, Hospitalhealth care evaluation mechanismshospitaloncology nursingpatient satisfactionSpanish satisfaction tool

Identifiers

PMID34394282
PMCPMC8356602
OpenAlexW3155591486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.