Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34394208›Full record

ArticleThe journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases2021

Proteomic characterization of

Emídio Beraldo, Guilherme Rabelo Coelho, Juliana Mozer Sciani, Daniel Carvalho Pimenta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Peptide Fraction fromAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Proteome of monocled cobra (Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Compositional and toxicological investigation of pooled venom from farm-raisedThe journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emídio BeraldoLaboratory of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Butantan Institute, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4735-5162
Guilherme Rabelo CoelhoLaboratory of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Butantan Institute, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9633-7219
Juliana Mozer ScianiMultidisciplinary Research Laboratory, São Francisco University, Bragança Paulista, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7213-206X
Daniel Carvalho PimentaLaboratory of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Butantan Institute, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2406-0860
Instituto Butantan · BRUniversidade São Francisco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

methodsWe have performed a liquid-chromatography (C18-RP-HPLC) mass spectrometry (ESI-IT-TOF/MS) based approach in order to biochemically characterize

resultsA wide variety of three-finger toxins (cardiotoxins) and metallopeptidases were detected. Less abundant, but still representative, were cysteine-rich secretory proteins, L-amino-acid oxidases, phospholipases A

conclusionThe present study set the basis for a better comprehension of the envenomation from a molecular perspective and, by increasing the interest and information available for this species, allows future venom comparisons among cobras and their diverse venom proteins.

Indexed as

EnzymesNaja mandalayensisProteomeSpitting cobraSVMPThree-finger toxins

Identifiers

PMID34394208
PMCPMC8331017
OpenAlexW3189724079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.