ArticleFrontiers in immunology2021
Apolipoprotein A4 Defines the Villus-Crypt Border in Duodenal Specimens for Celiac Disease Morphometry.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07556328 (Histological and Molecular Profiling in the Diagnostics and Treatment of Small-Bowel Diseases - A Prospective Cohort Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Histological and Molecular Profiling in the Diagnostics and Treatment of Small-Bowel Diseases - A Prospective Cohort Study (The DeepBowel Study)
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular histomorphometry and the emerging role of transcriptomics in celiac disease diagnosis and therapeutic trials.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Fabrication of an Anatomically Realistic Intestinal Phantom with Villous Microstructure.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- T cell receptors for antigen on intraepithelial cytolytic T lymphocytes in celiac disease engage enterocyte HLA-E and HLA-B.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- High dosage lipopolysaccharide-induced duodenal, cecal, hepatic, and cardiac inflammation, programmed cell death, permeability in chicken embryos models.Poultry science · 2025Article
- Transcriptomics and eQTLs reveal inflammatory heterogeneity in the duodenal lining in coeliac disease.Genes and immunity · 2025Article
- Pathologist-trained machine learning classifiers developed to quantitate celiac disease features differentiate endoscopic biopsies according to modified marsh score and dietary intervention response.Diagnostic pathology · 2023Article
- Apolipoprotein A-IV Has Bi-Functional Actions in Alcoholic Hepatitis by Regulating Hepatocyte Injury and Immune Cell Infiltration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Histological evaluation of the small intestinal mucosa is the cornerstone of celiac disease diagnostics and an important outcome in scientific studies. Gluten-dependent injury can be evaluated either with quantitative morphometry or grouped classifications. A drawback of mucosal readings is the subjective assessment of the border where the crypt epithelium changes to the differentiated villus epithelium. We studied potential immunohistochemical markers for the detection of the villus-crypt border: apolipoprotein A4 (APOA4), Ki-67, glucose transporter 2, keratin 20, cytochrome P450 3A4 and intestinal fatty-acid binding protein. Among these, villus-specific APOA4 was chosen as the best candidate for further studies. Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)- and APOA4 stained duodenal biopsy specimens from 74 adult patients were evaluated by five observers to determine the villus-to-crypt ratio (VH : CrD). APOA4 delineated the villus to crypt epithelium transition clearly, and the correlation coefficient of VH : CrD values between APOA4 and H&E was excellent (r=0.962). The VH : CrD values were lower in APOA4 staining (p<0.001) and a conversion factor of 0.2 in VH : CrD measurements was observed to make the two methods comparable to each other. In the intraobserver analysis, the doubled standard deviations, representing the error ranges, were 0.528 for H&E and 0.388 for APOA4 staining, and the ICCs were 0.980 and 0.971, respectively. In the interobserver analysis, the average error ranges were 1.017 for H&E and 0.847 for APOA4 staining, and the ICCs were better for APOA4 than for H&E staining in all analyses. In conclusion, the reliability and reproducibility of morphometrical VH : CrD readings are improved with the use of APOA4 staining.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.