Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34393862›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2021

Utility of SPECT Functional Neuroimaging of Pain.

Mohammed Bermo, Mohammed Saqr, Hunter Hoffman, David Patterson, Sam Sharar, Satoshi Minoshima, David H Lewis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohammed BermoVirginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, United States.
Mohammed SaqrSchool of Computing, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu Campus, Joensuu, Finland.
Hunter HoffmanUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
David PattersonUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Sam ShararUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Satoshi MinoshimaThe University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
David H LewisUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
University of Washington · USCarilion Clinic · USKTH Royal Institute of Technology · SEUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

OPTIMIZING THE CONTROL OF PAIN FROM SEVERE BURNSR01GM042725 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PATTERSON, DAVID R · 1990 to 2018
$7.5M
Identifying Virtual Reality Analgesia Mechanisms by Pharmacologic ManipulationR01DA026438 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SHARAR, SAM R · 2009 to 2013
$1.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026438NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM042725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging modalities vary in spatial and temporal resolution. One major limitation of most functional neuroimaging modalities is that only neural activation taking place inside the scanner can be imaged. This limitation makes functional neuroimaging in many clinical scenarios extremely difficult or impossible. The most commonly used radiopharmaceutical in Single Photon Emission Tomography (SPECT) functional brain imaging is Technetium 99 m-labeled Ethyl Cysteinate Dimer (ECD). ECD is a lipophilic compound with unique pharmacodynamics. It crosses the blood brain barrier and has high first pass extraction by the neurons proportional to regional brain perfusion at the time of injection. It reaches peak activity in the brain 1 min after injection and is then slowly cleared from the brain following a biexponential mode. This allows for a practical imaging window of 1 or 2 h after injection. In other words, it freezes a snapshot of brain perfusion at the time of injection that is kept and can be imaged later. This unique feature allows for designing functional brain imaging studies that do not require the patient to be inside the scanner at the time of brain activation. Functional brain imaging during severe burn wound care is an example that has been extensively studied using this technique. Not only does SPECT allow for imaging of brain activity under extreme pain conditions in clinical settings, but it also allows for imaging of brain activity modulation in response to analgesic maneuvers whether pharmacologic or non-traditional such as using virtual reality analgesia. Together with its utility in extreme situations, SPECTS is also helpful in investigating brain activation under typical pain conditions such as experimental controlled pain and chronic pain syndromes.

Indexed as

brainECDfunctional imagingpainSPECT

Identifiers

PMID34393862
PMCPMC8358271
OpenAlexW3192628448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.