Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34393738›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2021

Disruptions of Sustained Spatial Attention Can Be Resistant to the Distractor's Prior Reward Associations.

Matthew D Bachman, Madison N Hunter, Scott A Huettel, Marty G Woldorff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Impact of Reward Object on Object-Based Attention.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew D BachmanCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Madison N HunterDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Scott A HuettelCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Marty G WoldorffCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Duke University · US

Funding

Attentional Mechanisms in Multisensory EnvironmentsR01NS051048 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WOLDORFF, MARTY G. · 2006 to 2016
$3.5M
The Modulatory Role of Reward on Attentional Brain ProcessesR56NS051048 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WOLDORFF, MARTY G. · 2017 to 2017
$398k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS051048NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS051048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention can be involuntarily biased toward reward-associated distractors (value-driven attentional capture, VDAC). Yet past work has primarily demonstrated this distraction phenomenon during a particular set of circumstances: transient attentional orienting to potentially relevant stimuli occurring in our visual environment. Consequently, it is not well-understood if reward-based attentional capture can occur under other circumstances, such as during sustained visuospatial attention. Using EEG, we investigated whether associating transient distractors with reward value would increase their distractibility and lead to greater decrements in concurrent sustained spatial attention directed elsewhere. Human participants learned to associate three differently colored, laterally presented squares with rewards of varying magnitude (zero, small, and large). These colored squares were then periodically reintroduced as distractors at the same lateral locations during a demanding sustained-attention rapid-serial-visual-presentation (RSVP) task at the midline. Behavioral and neural evidence indicated that participants had successfully learned and maintained the reward associations to the distractors. During the RSVP task, consistent with prior work, we found that the distractors generated dips in the instantaneous amplitude of the steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) elicited by the midline RSVP stimuli, indicating that the distractors were indeed transiently disrupting sustained spatial attention. Contrary to our hypotheses, however, the magnitude of this dip did not differ by the magnitude of the distractor's reward associations. These results indicate that while sustained spatial attention can be impaired by the introduction of distractors at another location, the main distraction process is resistant to the distractors' reward associations, thus providing evidence of an important boundary condition to value-driven attentional capture.

Indexed as

distractionEEGreward associationsRSVPSSVEPsustained spatial attentionvalue-driven attention capture

Identifiers

PMID34393738
PMCPMC8363301
OpenAlexW3191510831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.