Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34393687›Full record

ArticleJournal of economic inequality2021

Did the UK policy response to Covid-19 protect household incomes?

Mike Brewer, Iva Valentinova Tasseva

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of economic inequality, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
18.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Modeling Key Strategies for Reducing Socio-Economic and Health Crisis: Perspective from COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. The Impacts of COVID-19 Shock on Intergenerational Income Mobility: Evidence from China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The impact of COVID-19 on households´ income in the EU.Journal of economic inequality · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mike BrewerResolution Foundation, 2 Queen Anne's Gate, London, SW1H 9AA UK.
Iva Valentinova TassevaLondon School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3302-8918
London School of Economics and Political Science · GBThe Princes Foundation · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We analyse the UK policy response to Covid-19 and its impact on household incomes in the UK in April and May 2020, using microsimulation methods. We estimate that households lost a substantial share of their net income of 6.9% on average. But policies protected household incomes to a substantial degree: compared to the drop in net income, GDP per capita fell by 18.9% between the first and second quarter of 2020. Earnings subsidies (the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme) protected household finances and provided the main insurance mechanism during the crisis. Besides subsidies, Covid-related increases to state benefits, as well as the automatic stabilisers in the tax and benefit system, played an important role in mitigating the income losses. However, analysing the impact of a near-decade of austerity on the UK safety net, we find that, compared to 2011 policies, the 2020 Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10888-021-09491-w.

Indexed as

Covid-19Earnings subsidies and tax-benefit policiesIncome distribution

Identifiers

PMID34393687
PMCPMC8345904
OpenAlexW3035797634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.