ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2021
Age as Indicator in the Selection of Surgery Modalities in Early Glottic Cancer.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Risk factors of recurrence and canceration for premalignant vocal fold lesions after surgery].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLocal failure after endoscopic laryngeal surgery (ELS) for early glottic cancer mounts a challenge to researchers to investigate risk factors of recurrence. The present study was therefore designed to explore the prognostic factors in patients who underwent ELS for early glottic cancer. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe reviewed 328 patients with T1-2N0 glottic cancer who were treated with either ELS or open surgery between 2007 and 2018 at our institution. Survival, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed in different groups (ELS vs open surgery; < 65 vs ≥ 65 years).
resultsAge was discovered to be the independent prognostic factor of DFS for patients treated with ELS (HR = 3.673, p = 0.003), but not for patients who underwent open surgery. Survival analysis performed on young patients (< 65 years) showed that survival outcomes between different surgery modalities were significantly different (ELS vs open surgery: five-year DFS: 72.5 vs 84.7%, p = 0.034). Univariate and multivariate analyses further confirmed the finding, whereas these results did not appear in old patients (≥ 65 years).
conclusionYoung patients (< 65 years) treated with ELS had less favorable oncologic outcomes than those treated with open surgery. Young patients (< 65 years) are advised to consider open surgery over ELS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.