ArticleInternational journal of women's health2021
Fetal and Neonatal Modified Myocardial Performance Indices in Preeclamptic versus Normotensive Pregnancies: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-Organ Phenotypes of Offspring Born Following Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Pooled it
- Using Doppler ultrasound to assess fetal cardiac function and pregnancy outcomes in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome pregnancies: a case-control study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare fetal and neonatal cardiac functions in terms of global, systolic, and diastolic function between the preeclampsia and normotensive blood pressure of pregnancies.
methodsA prospective cohort study was conducted at a university hospital in Northeast Thailand. Twenty-nine pregnancies diagnosed as preeclampsia with or without severe features were compared with 29 normotensive pregnancies. Global cardiac, systolic, and diastolic function were assessed at prenatal and postnatal periods, by a professionally trained obstetrician and pediatric cardiologist, respectively.
resultsThe fetal left modified myocardium performance index (Mod-MPI) in preeclampsia and normotensive blood pressure were 0.60±0.08 and 0.59±0.08 (
conclusionNeonatal MV-E PV of the preeclampsia group was significantly higher than the normotensive blood pressure group, while there were no statistically significant differences in terms of global cardiac and diastolic functions during the fetal period between two groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.