Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34393503›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2021

Application of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Microarray in Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetuses with Central Nervous System Abnormalities.

Xiaorui Xie, Xiaoqing Wu, Linjuan Su, Meiying Cai, Ying Li, Hailong Huang, Liangpu Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaorui XieMedical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-9965-2791
Xiaoqing WuMedical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China.
Linjuan SuMedical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China.
Meiying CaiMedical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China.
Ying LiMedical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China.
Hailong HuangMedical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China.
Liangpu XuMedical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-8815-2735

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current gold standard of karyotype analysis for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities has some limitations. Here, we assessed the value of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays as a diagnostic tool.

methodsThe results of prenatal diagnosis of 344 fetuses with CNS abnormalities as determined by ultrasonographic screening were retrospectively analyzed. All fetuses underwent chromosomal karyotype analysis and genome-wide SNP array analysis simultaneously. The resultant rates and frequencies of genomic abnormalities were compared.

resultsKaryotype analysis found 45 (13.2%) abnormal CNS cases, while SNP array found 60 (17.4%) cases. SNP array detected 23 (6.7%) cases of submicroscopic abnormalities that karyotype analysis did not find. The detection rate of karyotype analysis was 8.1% in the group with isolated CNS anomalies, but 16.5% in the group with CNS abnormalities plus extra ultrasound anomalies. Detection rates of SNP array were 12.4% and 20.8% in these two groups, respectively. Statistical analysis showed that the detection rates of both methods were significantly higher in the group with CNS malformations and other ultrasound anomalies than in the group with isolated CNS anomalies. Abnormal chromosomes were detected most frequently in fetuses with holoprosencephaly.

conclusionGenome-wide SNP array technology can significantly improve the positive detection rate of fetuses with CNS abnormalities. Combining karyotype analysis and SNP array technology is recommended for detecting the development of fetuses with abnormal CNS.

Indexed as

central nervous system abnormalitieschromosomekaryotype analysisprenatal diagnosissingle nucleotide polymorphism microarray

Identifiers

PMID34393503
PMCPMC8354765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.