Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34393370›Full record

ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2021

Examination of the innominate movements in individuals with and without a positive march test.

Beth Moody Jones, Yuri Yoshida

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Beth Moody JonesDivision of Physical Therapy, University of New Mexico: Albuquerque, NM 87131-1466, USA.
Yuri YoshidaDivision of Physical Therapy, University of New Mexico: Albuquerque, NM 87131-1466, USA.
University of New Mexico · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[Purpose] The March Test (MT), evaluating hypomobility of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ), is often used in clinical practice to evaluate low back pain but has limited reported validity and reliability. Capturing the innominate movement at SIJ associated with the results of MT has not been examined. The purpose of this study was to determine if there was a significant difference in the motion of the innominate between a positive and a negative MT. [Participants and Methods] Sixteen healthy volunteers were assigned into two groups: positive or negative results of the MT. All participants were asked to perform three different tasks: standing on both limbs, static standing on one-limb and flexing the hip to 90 and 100 degrees, and active flexing the hip past 90 degrees. In a 3D motion analysis system, virtual vectors created by landmarks over the ilium defined innominate movement of the ilium related to the sacrum, which were compared between the groups. [Results] There was significantly limited innominate movement in the March Test positive group compared to the March Test negative group. [Conclusion] This study showed hypomobility at SIJ in the March test positive groups. Further investigation is needed for clinical applications.

Indexed as

InnominateMarch testSacroiliac joint

Identifiers

PMID34393370
PMCPMC8332646
OpenAlexW3187260934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.