Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34393317›Full record

ArticleArtificial intelligence review2022

Machine Learning in Drug Discovery: A Review.

Suresh Dara, Swetha Dhamercherla, Surender Singh Jadav, Ch Madhu Babu, Mohamed Jawed Ahsan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Artificial intelligence review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 237 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
237citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

237 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Preclinical models of COPD: a state of the art review.The European respiratory journal · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

177 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Suresh DaraDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, B V Raju Institute of Technology, Narsapur, Medak, 502313 Telangana India.ORCID 0000-0002-1626-8701
Swetha DhamercherlaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, B V Raju Institute of Technology, Narsapur, Medak, 502313 Telangana India.
Surender Singh JadavCentre for Molecular Cancer Research (CMCR) and Vishnu Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (VIPER), Narsapur, Medak, 502313 Telangana India.
Ch Madhu BabuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, B V Raju Institute of Technology, Narsapur, Medak, 502313 Telangana India.
Mohamed Jawed AhsanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Maharishi Arvind College of Pharmacy, Jaipur, 302023 Rajasthan India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review provides the feasible literature on drug discovery through ML tools and techniques that are enforced in every phase of drug development to accelerate the research process and deduce the risk and expenditure in clinical trials. Machine learning techniques improve the decision-making in pharmaceutical data across various applications like QSAR analysis, hit discoveries, de novo drug architectures to retrieve accurate outcomes. Target validation, prognostic biomarkers, digital pathology are considered under problem statements in this review. ML challenges must be applicable for the main cause of inadequacy in interpretability outcomes that may restrict the applications in drug discovery. In clinical trials, absolute and methodological data must be generated to tackle many puzzles in validating ML techniques, improving decision-making, promoting awareness in ML approaches, and deducing risk failures in drug discovery.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDigital pathologyDrug discoveryMachine learningPrognostic biomarkersTarget validation

Identifiers

PMID34393317
PMCPMC8356896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.