ArticleComputational statistics & data analysis2021
Marginal false discovery rate for a penalized transformation survival model.
Article in Computational statistics & data analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Is Seeing Believing? A Practitioner's Perspective on High-Dimensional Statistical Inference in Cancer Genomics Studies.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Survival analysis that involves moderate/high dimensional covariates has become common. Most of the existing analyses have been focused on estimation and variable selection, using penalization and other regularization techniques. To draw more definitive conclusions, a handful of studies have also conducted inference. The recently developed mFDR (marginal false discovery rate) technique provides an alternative inference perspective and can be advantageous in multiple aspects. The existing inference studies for regularized estimation of survival data with moderate/high dimensional covariates assume the Cox and other specific models, which may not be sufficiently flexible. To tackle this problem, the analysis scope is expanded to the transformation model, which is robust and has been shown to be desirable for practical data analysis. Statistical validity is rigorously established. Two data analyses are conducted. Overall, an alternative inference approach has been developed for survival analysis with moderate/high dimensional data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.