Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34393232›Full record

ArticleBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences2021

[Comparison of long-term outcomes in different managements of diverticular neck in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for diverticular calculi].

X Dai, M N Zuo, X P Zhang, H Hu, T Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

X DaiDepartment of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
M N ZuoDepartment of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
X P ZhangDepartment of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
H HuDepartment of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
T XuDepartment of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the short-term effects and long-term outcomes of incisional procedure and dilatation procedure to manage diverticular neck in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for diverticular stones.

methodsClinical data of 61 patients with diverticular stones who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy from June 2009 to January 2019 were retrospectively collected and analyzed, which was as follous: (1) basic information: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classifications and preoperative symptoms.(2)stone characteristic and procedure-related data: location and size of stone, skinned renal access length and procedure time.(3)perioperative clinical data: hemoglobin drop, Clavien's classification and stone-free rate. Long-term follow-ups were performed for more than 5 years after the patients were discharged.

resultsFifty-three patients were included based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and were divided into the dilation group (

conclusionBoth incisional and dilatation procedures in percutaneous nephrolithotomy to manage diverticular neck could bring the satisfactory postoperative stone free rate. The recurrence rate was about 30% to 40% 5 years after surgery.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousNephrostomy, PercutaneousAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDiverticular calculiDiverticular neck managementLong-term follow-upPercutaneous nephrolithotomy

Identifiers

PMID34393232
PMCPMC8365065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.