ArticleBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences2021
[Prognostic factors for failure of transvaginal repair of vesicovaginal fistula: A nested case-control study].
Article in Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Factors of Transvaginal Repair for Vesicovaginal Fistulas: A 5-Year Single-Center Study.International urogynecology journal · 2026Observational
- Prevalence and repair patterns of vesicovaginal fistula: a large retrospective population-based cohort analysis.World journal of urology · 2024Article
- Clinical efficacy of flap transfer coverage in the treatment of vesicovaginal fistula.International urogynecology journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the prognostic factors affecting the failure of transvaginal repair of vesicovaginal fistula (VVF).
methodsA retrospective nested case-control study was conducted. A total of 15 patients who underwent unsuccessful transvaginal vesicovaginal fistula repair in the Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital from January 2014 to December 2020 were enrolled as the case group. A total of 60 patients receiving transvaginal vesicovaginal fistula repair by the same surgeon within the same time range, were selected as the control group. The age, body mass index (BMI), etiology of vesicovaginal fistula, associated genitourinary malformation, frequency of repair, characteristics of fistula, surgical procedure, postoperative recovery and other factors were compared between the case group and the control group, and the influencing factors of failure were analyzed.
resultsThe BMI of the case group was (26.3±3.9) kg/m
conclusionFistula diameter ≥1 cm and repeated transvaginal repair are independent prognostic factors of failure in transvaginal repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34393227PMC8365071W3193846522What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.