Clinician preferences for using bipolar disorder symptom severity and quality of life scales for measurement-based care.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Bipolar disorder assessment and monitoring measures in clinical care: Updates from a large randomized controlled trial in primary care.Bipolar disorders · 2023
   Trial
2. Bipolar disorder measurement-based care: Two-phase trial in primary care.General hospital psychiatry
   Trial
3. Bipolar Disorder Symptom Monitoring Measures: A Mixed-Methods Study of Patient Preferences.Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as