Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34392718›Full record

ArticleMultiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)2022

Exploring CSF neurofilament light as a biomarker for MS in clinical practice; a retrospective registry-based study.

Igal Rosenstein, Markus Axelsson, Lenka Novakova, Kaj Blennow, Henrik Zetterberg, Jan Lycke

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Igal RosensteinDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5078-9690
Markus AxelssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lenka NovakovaDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7899-6395
Kaj BlennowDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden/Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden.
Henrik ZetterbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden/Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden/Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK/UK Dementia Research Institute, University College London (UCL), London, UK.
Jan LyckeDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7891-8466
Sahlgrenska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeurofilament light (NFL) has been increasingly recognized for prognostic and therapeutic decisions.

objectiveTo validate the utility of cerebrospinal fluid NFL (cNFL) as a biomarker in clinical practice of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

methodsRRMS patients (

resultsRRMS with relapse had 4.4 times higher median cNFL concentration (1134 [interquartile range (IQR) 499-2744] ng/L) than those without relapse (264 [125-537] ng/L,

conclusionscNFL is a robust and reliable biomarker of disease activity, treatment response, and prediction of disability and conversion from RRMS to SPMS. Our data suggest that cNFL should be included in the assessment of patients at MS-onset.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingBiomarkersDisease ProgressionHumansIntermediate FilamentsNeurofilament ProteinsRecurrenceRegistriesRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersNeurofilament Proteinscerebrospinal fluidMultiple sclerosisneurofilament light proteinprognosistherapy

Identifiers

PMID34392718
PMCPMC9024026
OpenAlexW3196180934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.