Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34392602›Full record

ArticleVeterinary and comparative oncology2022

Prognostic impact of bone invasion in canine oral malignant melanoma treated by surgery and anti-CSPG4 vaccination: A retrospective study on 68 cases (2010-2020).

Mariateresa Camerino, Davide Giacobino, Luca Manassero, Selina Iussich, Federica Riccardo, Federica Cavallo, Lidia Tarone, Matteo Olimpo, Elena Lardone, Marina Martano and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary and comparative oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mariateresa CamerinoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2850-6794
Davide GiacobinoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Luca ManasseroDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Selina IussichDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Federica RiccardoDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Federica CavalloDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4571-1060
Lidia TaroneDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Matteo OlimpoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Elena LardoneDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Marina MartanoDepartment of Medical Veterinary Science, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Sara Del MagnoDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2900-6989
Paolo BuraccoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0181-0887
Emanuela MorelloDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
University of Turin · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prognosis of canine oral malignant melanoma encompasses clinical, histological and immunohistochemical parameters. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of bone invasion in oral canine melanoma. Sixty-eight dogs bearing oral melanoma staged II and III that underwent surgery and anti-CSPG4 electrovaccination, with available histological data and a minimum follow up of minimum 1 year, were retrospectively selected. Bone invasion was detected on imaging and/or histology. Median survival time of dogs with evidence of bone invasion (group 1) was 397 days and significantly shorter compared with dogs with oral melanomas not invading the bone (group 2, 1063 days). Dogs with tumours localised at the level of the cheek, lip, tongue and soft palate (soft tissue - group 3) lived significantly longer compared with dogs having tumours within the gingiva of the maxilla or mandible (hard tissue - group 4) with a median survival time of 1063 and 470 days, respectively. Within group 4, the subgroup of dogs with tumours not invading the bone (group 5) showed a significant prolonged survival time (972 days) in comparison with dogs of group 1 (bone invasion group). Similar results were obtained for the disease-free intervals amongst the different groups. Statistical analysis showed that Ki67 and mitotic count were correlated with shorter survival in patients of group 1 (with bone invasion). Bone invasion should always be assessed since it appears to be a negative prognostic factor.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesMelanomaMouth NeoplasmsAnimalsCutaneous Malignant MelanomaDogsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSkin NeoplasmsVaccinationanti-CSPG4 electrovaccinationbone invasiondogoral melanomaprognosissurgery

Identifiers

PMID34392602
PMCPMC9290081
OpenAlexW3194331737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.