Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34392413›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Psychosocial well-being and supportive care needs of cancer patients and survivors living in rural or regional areas: a systematic review from 2010 to 2021.

Shannen R van der Kruk, Phyllis Butow, Ilse Mesters, Terry Boyle, Ian Olver, Kate White, Sabe Sabesan, Rob Zielinski, Bryan A Chan, Kristiaan Spronk and 5 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The experience and supportive care needs in people affected by ovarian cancer and their informal caregivers: a qualitative systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Social determinants of health in studies using PROMs to assess toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. A systematic review on the qualitative experiences of people living with lung cancer in rural areas.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Article
  13. Navigating rural challenges and promoting posttraumatic growth via expressive writing: a qualitative study among rural breast cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Experiences of colorectal cancer patients in Australia: a qualitative study on specialised nursing and supportive care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Survivorship Care Plan use by cancer survivors living in rural versus urban settings: A qualitative analysis.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Shannen R van der KrukDepartment of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5132-668X
Phyllis ButowCentre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3562-6954
Ilse MestersDepartment of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0605-6286
Terry BoyleAustralian Centre for Precision Health, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6741-330X
Ian OlverFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5478-1576
Kate WhiteFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4763-1734
Sabe SabesanCollege of Medicine and Dentistry (CMD), James Cook University, QLD, Townsville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9068-8755
Rob ZielinskiCentral West Cancer Care Centre, Orange Base Hospital, Orange, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4807-8523
Bryan A ChanSchool of Medicine, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6492-1197
Kristiaan SpronkCancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7773-1587
Peter GrimisonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2653-1657
Craig UnderhillBorder Medical Oncology, Albury, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9335-2678
Laura KirstenNepean Cancer Care Centre, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Kate M GunnCancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia. kate.gunn@unisa.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0837-6814
Clinical Oncological Society of Australia

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo summarise what is currently known about the psychosocial morbidity, experiences, and needs of people with cancer and their informal caregivers, who live in rural or regional areas of developed countries.

methodsEligible studies dating from August 2010 until May 2021 were identified through several online databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and RURAL (Rural and Remote Health Database). Results were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines and the protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020171764).

resultsSixty-five studies were included in this review, including 20 qualitative studies, 41 quantitative studies, and 4 mixed methods studies. Qualitative research demonstrated that many unique psychosocial needs of rural people remain unmet, particularly relating to finances, travel, and accessing care. However, most (9/19) quantitative studies that compared rural and urban groups reported no significant differences in psychosocial needs, morbidity, or quality of life (QOL). Five quantitative studies reported poorer psychosocial outcomes (social and emotional functioning) in urban cancer survivors, while three highlighted poorer outcomes (physical functioning, role functioning, and self-reported mental health outcomes) in the rural group.

conclusionRecent research shows that rural people affected by cancer have unique unmet psychosocial needs relating to rurality. However, there was little evidence that rural cancer survivors report greater unmet needs than their urban counterparts. This contrasts to the findings from a 2011 systematic review that found rural survivors consistently reported worse psychosocial outcomes. More population-based research is needed to establish whether uniquely rural unmet needs are due to general or cancer-specific factors.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsQuality of LifeCaregiversHumansRural PopulationSurvivorsCancerHealthcare needsInformal caregiversOncologyPsychosocialRural

Identifiers

PMID34392413
PMCPMC8364415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.